Auteur: Peter Boel

  • Svidler and Fedoseev win matches, Amin wins Open

    Svidler and Fedoseev win matches, Amin wins Open

    FInd all photos here.

    Today, in an all-decisive final round, Peter Svidler consolidated his match win over Sam Shankland with a fairly quiet draw: 3½-2½. After another long draw between Vladimir Fedoseev and Jorden van Foreest (3-3), the Russian and the Dutchman had to play a tiebreak, which was won 2-1 by Fedoseev after a tense fight.

    Bassem Amin won the Open by directly beating Dmitry Kryakvin in the final today, when the Russian GM allowed a decisive combination in a slightly worse position. The battle for third place had to be decided in a playoff as Erik van den Doel and Eltaj Safarli drew their ‘regular’ game. Azeri GM Safarli won the tiebreak by 1½-½, achieving third place.

    The ‘Best of the Rest’ in the Open were four players this time. Roeland Pruijssers missed a win against Thomas Beerdsen and they drew, as did Valentin Buckels against P Karthikeyan. This allowed Gadir Guseinov to catch up on 6½ points. 13-year-old Rakshitta Ravi from India won a WIM-norm, and the rating prize was won by Dutchman Frans Konings.

    Opening final round and game prizes

    Tournament director Loek van Wely opened the final round of the Matches, the final and consolation final of the Open, and the ‘rest’ of the Open and said he hoped we would be closing off with an exciting last day.

    Van Wely gave book prizes to nine winners of beautiful or spectacular games: Loek van der Hagen (round 1 vs David Murray)…

    Loek I congratulating Loek II

    Max Warmerdam (vs Erik Sparenberg, round 2), Henry Li (vs Rob Bertholee, round 2), Jonas Hilwerda (vs Kasper Bleeker, round 2), Nico Zwirs (vs Dries Wedda, round 3; ‘not completely correct but I liked it very much’), David Miedema (vs Jens Ingebretsen, round 5), Emma de Vries (vs Kasper Bleeker, round 5)…

    Loek with Emma de Vries

    Eltaj Safarli (vs P Karthikeyan, round 6), P Iniyan (vs Roel Hamblok, round 6), and finally Kasper Bleeker (vs Yannic Husers, round 8).

    Something old and something new

    Peter Svidler opened with 1.c4 and after 1…g6 went for the same line he had already faced twice here in Hoogeveen, but deviated himself with 5.Qa4.

    Vladimir Fedoseev may have surprised Jorden van Foreest with 6…e5 after 6.Be2 in the Najdorf. Before he had opted for the Scheveningen set-up with …e7-e6. With same-side castling the position is relatively quiet for an open Sicilian.

     

    The Finals

    In the final of the open, Bassem Amin went for an ambitious set-up in a Closed Sicilian with f2-f4. In the ‘consolation final’, the struggle for third prize in the Open, Erik van den Doel is playing a Torre against Eltaj Safarli instead of the London Systems he tried yesterday against Dmitry Kryakvin in the semi-final and the second playoff game.

    One quick draw

    Mila Zarkovic and Tijana Blagojevic adorned our playing field only for a very short time today. The computer had paired the two Serbian WIMs against each other, with an ultra-quick draw as a result. They did play 22 moves in an Exchange Ruy Lopez.

    Amin wins final!

    The final game of the Open was shockingly short when Dmitry Kryakvin made a losing mistake on move 24:

    Amin-Kryakvin

    In this slightly worse position Kryakvin blundered with 24…Bb7?? and now after the crushing reply 25.Qe8+! there is always a fork check on e6: 25…Rxe8 26.Rxe8+ Rf8(26…Kg7 27.Ne6+) 27.Rxf8+ Kxf8 28.Ne6+ Kf7 29.Nxc5 Bxg2+ 30.Kxg2 and the Russian GM had had enough.

    Congratulations to the super-GM from Egypt, who was always in the top of the rankings and was never really in trouble: a fully deserved tournament victory!

    Bassem Amin in a characteristic pose

     

    Second playoff for Van den Doel

    The struggle for third place goed on. Eltaj Safarli offered a draw already early, Erik van den Doel first refused but then, on move 17, he decided to go for the blitz playoff anyway. Will he do better than yesterday against Kryakvin?

    Erik van den Doel

    Equalish positions

    With his careful strategy, Jorden van Foreest seemed to have a little something, but when he lost some time with the manoeuvre 21.Bg4 and 22.Bf3 Vladimir Fedoseev got full-fledged counterplay on the queenside, which seems to be enough compensation for the strong white knight on d5.

    On move 14, after the queens had been exchanged, Peter Svidler played an interesting move:

    14.Bf4!?

    Just ignoring the attack on the b3-pawn.

    If 14…Bxb3 15.Nd2 and now on 15…a4 (on 15…Bc2 there is 16.e5 with the same problem) 16.Nxb3 (16.Ra3? e5! is too slow) 16…axb3 17.e5! is strong, as Gert Ligterink explained in the commentary room. On 17…Nh5 18.Be3 Black has problems, and after 17…Ng4 18.h3 Nh6 White can push first g3-g4 and later d4-d5.

    Shankland didn’t take the b-pawn – he did this only on move 22, after White had cashed the a-pawn first.

    Winners Amateur group II

    Between Gert Ligterink’s comments the prize-giving of Amateur Group II took place. The winners were:

    1 Oseb Merkan 7 points out of 9

    Oseb Merkan

    2 Wouter Lardinois 6½

    3 Matthijs Dijkstra, Pierre Smeets 6

    5 Gijs van Dongen, Govert Pellikaan, Fons van Hamond 5½

     

    The rating prize went to Coert Joost (4½ point).

     

    Guseinov increases the pressure

    Gadir Guseinov achieved 6½ points today with a victory over Robert Baskin. The young German was attacking, but probably over-reached with his imposing pawn centre and lost not long after. Will the Azeri GM catch up with the 3 leaders?

    Gadir Guseinov

    Machteld is on plus-1

    Will Machteld van Foreest (11) become the strongest woman player in this tournament? It is still possible after her fabulous 4½ points in the last 5 rounds, but she will have to beat Simon Elgersma with black (and Sonja Maria Bluhm as well as Rakshitta Ravi will have to lose). The position doesn’t seem to make this very probable, but you never know…

    Fedoseev squeezing

    Vladimir Fedoseev is slowly increasing the pressure on the white position, and the people in the press room are expecting a long squeeze. The game Svidler-Shankland looks very equal, but the American is going to have to try something to save the match!

    Sam Shankland

    Svidler is deciding the match

    Peter Svidler is consolidating – he has won Black’s c5-pawn and is now a pawn up in a rook ending – so unless an earthquake happens he should be winning the match 3½-2½.

    Peter Svidler yesterday

    The position in Van Foreest-Fedoseev seems dead equal again.

    Draws in both matches

    As every day, first Svidler and Shankland were finished, and after that, Van Foreest and Fedoseev. Today both games again ended in draws. In the Svidler-Shankland game there were many interesting sidelines with all those minor pieces flying around. The gist was, as Svidler said: ‘I can try to force a draw but I am better and I don’t wanna beg for it.’ So with a pawn up in the rook endgame he didn’t have to, and so he won the match 3½-2½.

    Fedoseev didn’t manage to get anything concrete either, despite trying for a long time. This means that Jorden van Foreest has really increased his defensive abilities and shown that he can hold up against a world top player. The match will be decided by blitz games. Shankland was wondering when he was relaxing after the game: ‘How many draws will they make in the blitz before someone finally wins…?’ We’ll soon see!

    ‘What opening will I play later on in the blitz playoff…? ‘

    Safarli and Fedoseev win thrilling tiebreaks

    Two thrilling tiebreaks just decided third place in the open and match victory between Vladimir Fedoseev and Jorden van Foreest.

    First Erik van den Doel en Eltaj Safarli battled it out. Like yesterday, Van den Doel played very well but still didn’t make it somehow. In the first game he was winning when he knocked down some of Safarli’s pieces with his move 49…Ne2. Whether he was adjusting him in his own time or not, the Azeri, who had only 3 seconds left, immediately sat back, exclaiming ‘This is not possible!’ Chief arbiter Frans Peeters gave Safarli 10 seconds extra, and Van den Doel seemed to go on to win but blundered a rook just before move 50.

    Van den Doel (White) vs Safarli

    In the second game, Van den Doel was pressing with white, but when time ran low he sacked a piece. Safarli could perhaps even have won but decided the match with a perpetual.

    In the first game in the other tiebreak, Fedoseev started with 1.b3 and showed some real powerplay. However Van Foreest defended very coolly. Vladimir started looking for a new plan and ‘suddenly’ lost on time.

    In the second game, the Russian played a Hippopotamus with black. Now Van Foreest was pressing, winning a pawn and playing fast, natural moves. However when he won 2 more pawns with a fork trick the result was that his knight got caught on d8. It was still highly unclear with 4 pawns for a piece, but Fedoseev converted excellently with 10 seconds to go after just about every move.

    Game 3 again started with 1.b3. After a while Fedoseev won an exchange for a pawn, but this was the sign for Van Foreest to start an attack on the white king. Just when the Russian had his defence organized, Van Foreest blundered with …h4? and lost soon after.

    Fedoseev (White) vs Van Foreest

    Fedoseev was getting ready for a fourth game, but then he heard that he had already won the match! After the 1-1 tie it was sudden death. So he won the match 5-4.

    Four winners in Open

    The Open ended in a four-way tie today. Gadir Guseinov quite quickly beat Robert Baskin, while 17-year-old Valentin Buckels (who already became an IM at the FIDE congress on 6 October) drew P Karthikeyan. The battle between Roeland Pruijssers and his teammate Thomas Beerdsen would decide everything. Pruijssers was always better with white, and Beerdsen sacked an exchange to get some play. On move 35 White would have been winning if he had played 35.g4!. ‘I thought 35.f5 was winning too but I overlooked something’, Pruijssers said, and then it turned out just to be a stupid move. In the end I could play for an attack but that might also have misfired, so I opted for the perpetual.’

    Roeland Pruijssers (left) vs Thomas Beerdsen

    This meant that Guseinov, Beerdsen, Buckels and Pruijssers ended in a tie on 6½ point.

    Rakshitta Ravi lost today from a probably winning position, missing a WGM norm. The 13-year-old from Chennai still has a WIM-norm, but that was small consolation. With a draw, Machteld van Foreest (11) drew even with her, as well as Elena Tomilova and Sonja Maria Bluhm as the highest-ending woman players, all on plus-1!

    The rating prize goes to FM Frans Konings, who ended a wonderful tournament on a 6/9 score.

     
  • Svidler en Fedoseev winnen de matches. Amin wint de Open

    Svidler en Fedoseev winnen de matches. Amin wint de Open

    Find all photos here.

    Today, in an all-decisive final round, Peter Svidler consolidated his match win over Sam Shankland with a fairly quiet draw: 3½-2½. After another long draw between Vladimir Fedoseev and Jorden van Foreest (3-3), the Russian and the Dutchman had to play a tiebreak, which was won 2-1 by Fedoseev after a tense fight.

    Bassem Amin won the Open by directly beating Dmitry Kryakvin in the final today, when the Russian GM allowed a decisive combination in a slightly worse position. The battle for third place had to be decided in a playoff as Erik van den Doel and Eltaj Safarli drew their ‘regular’ game. Azeri GM Safarli won the tiebreak by 1½-½, achieving third place.

    The ‘Best of the Rest’ in the Open were four players this time. Roeland Pruijssers missed a win against Thomas Beerdsen and they drew, as did Valentin Buckels against P Karthikeyan. This allowed Gadir Guseinov to catch up on 6½ points. 13-year-old Rakshitta Ravi from India won a WIM-norm, and the rating prize was won by Dutchman Frans Konings.

    Opening final round and game prizes

    Tournament director Loek van Wely opened the final round of the Matches, the final and consolation final of the Open, and the ‘rest’ of the Open and said he hoped we would be closing off with an exciting last day.

    Van Wely gave book prizes to nine winners of beautiful or spectacular games: Loek van der Hagen (round 1 vs David Murray)…

    Loek I congratulating Loek II

    Max Warmerdam (vs Erik Sparenberg, round 2), Henry Li (vs Rob Bertholee, round 2), Jonas Hilwerda (vs Kasper Bleeker, round 2), Nico Zwirs (vs Dries Wedda, round 3; ‘not completely correct but I liked it very much’), David Miedema (vs Jens Ingebretsen, round 5), Emma de Vries (vs Kasper Bleeker, round 5)…

    Loek with Emma de Vries

    Eltaj Safarli (vs P Karthikeyan, round 6), P Iniyan (vs Roel Hamblok, round 6), and finally Kasper Bleeker (vs Yannic Husers, round 8).

    Something old and something new

    Peter Svidler opened with 1.c4 and after 1…g6 went for the same line he had already faced twice here in Hoogeveen, but deviated himself with 5.Qa4.

    Vladimir Fedoseev may have surprised Jorden van Foreest with 6…e5 after 6.Be2 in the Najdorf. Before he had opted for the Scheveningen set-up with …e7-e6. With same-side castling the position is relatively quiet for an open Sicilian.

     

    The Finals

    In the final of the open, Bassem Amin went for an ambitious set-up in a Closed Sicilian with f2-f4. In the ‘consolation final’, the struggle for third prize in the Open, Erik van den Doel is playing a Torre against Eltaj Safarli instead of the London Systems he tried yesterday against Dmitry Kryakvin in the semi-final and the second playoff game.

    One quick draw

    Mila Zarkovic and Tijana Blagojevic adorned our playing field only for a very short time today. The computer had paired the two Serbian WIMs against each other, with an ultra-quick draw as a result. They did play 22 moves in an Exchange Ruy Lopez.

    Amin wins final!

    The final game of the Open was shockingly short when Dmitry Kryakvin made a losing mistake on move 24:

    Amin-Kryakvin

    In this slightly worse position Kryakvin blundered with 24…Bb7?? and now after the crushing reply 25.Qe8+! there is always a fork check on e6: 25…Rxe8 26.Rxe8+ Rf8(26…Kg7 27.Ne6+) 27.Rxf8+ Kxf8 28.Ne6+ Kf7 29.Nxc5 Bxg2+ 30.Kxg2 and the Russian GM had had enough.

    Congratulations to the super-GM from Egypt, who was always in the top of the rankings and was never really in trouble: a fully deserved tournament victory!

    Bassem Amin in a characteristic pose

     

    Second playoff for Van den Doel

    The struggle for third place goed on. Eltaj Safarli offered a draw already early, Erik van den Doel first refused but then, on move 17, he decided to go for the blitz playoff anyway. Will he do better than yesterday against Kryakvin?

    Erik van den Doel

    Equalish positions

    With his careful strategy, Jorden van Foreest seemed to have a little something, but when he lost some time with the manoeuvre 21.Bg4 and 22.Bf3 Vladimir Fedoseev got full-fledged counterplay on the queenside, which seems to be enough compensation for the strong white knight on d5.

    On move 14, after the queens had been exchanged, Peter Svidler played an interesting move:

    14.Bf4!?

    Just ignoring the attack on the b3-pawn.

    If 14…Bxb3 15.Nd2 and now on 15…a4 (on 15…Bc2 there is 16.e5 with the same problem) 16.Nxb3 (16.Ra3? e5! is too slow) 16…axb3 17.e5! is strong, as Gert Ligterink explained in the commentary room. On 17…Nh5 18.Be3 Black has problems, and after 17…Ng4 18.h3 Nh6 White can push first g3-g4 and later d4-d5.

    Shankland didn’t take the b-pawn – he did this only on move 22, after White had cashed the a-pawn first.

    Winners Amateur group II

    Between Gert Ligterink’s comments the prize-giving of Amateur Group II took place. The winners were:

    1 Oseb Merkan 7 points out of 9

    Oseb Merkan

    2 Wouter Lardinois 6½

    3 Matthijs Dijkstra, Pierre Smeets 6

    5 Gijs van Dongen, Govert Pellikaan, Fons van Hamond 5½

     

    The rating prize went to Coert Joost (4½ point).

     

    Guseinov increases the pressure

    Gadir Guseinov achieved 6½ points today with a victory over Robert Baskin. The young German was attacking, but probably over-reached with his imposing pawn centre and lost not long after. Will the Azeri GM catch up with the 3 leaders?

    Gadir Guseinov

    Machteld is on plus-1

    Will Machteld van Foreest (11) become the strongest woman player in this tournament? It is still possible after her fabulous 4½ points in the last 5 rounds, but she will have to beat Simon Elgersma with black (and Sonja Maria Bluhm as well as Rakshitta Ravi will have to lose). The position doesn’t seem to make this very probable, but you never know…

    Fedoseev squeezing

    Vladimir Fedoseev is slowly increasing the pressure on the white position, and the people in the press room are expecting a long squeeze. The game Svidler-Shankland looks very equal, but the American is going to have to try something to save the match!

    Sam Shankland

    Svidler is deciding the match

    Peter Svidler is consolidating – he has won Black’s c5-pawn and is now a pawn up in a rook ending – so unless an earthquake happens he should be winning the match 3½-2½.

    Peter Svidler yesterday

    The position in Van Foreest-Fedoseev seems dead equal again.

    Draws in both matches

    As every day, first Svidler and Shankland were finished, and after that, Van Foreest and Fedoseev. Today both games again ended in draws. In the Svidler-Shankland game there were many interesting sidelines with all those minor pieces flying around. The gist was, as Svidler said: ‘I can try to force a draw but I am better and I don’t wanna beg for it.’ So with a pawn up in the rook endgame he didn’t have to, and so he won the match 3½-2½.

    Fedoseev didn’t manage to get anything concrete either, despite trying for a long time. This means that Jorden van Foreest has really increased his defensive abilities and shown that he can hold up against a world top player. The match will be decided by blitz games. Shankland was wondering when he was relaxing after the game: ‘How many draws will they make in the blitz before someone finally wins…?’ We’ll soon see!

    ‘What opening will I play later on in the blitz playoff…? ‘

    Safarli and Fedoseev win thrilling tiebreaks

    Two thrilling tiebreaks just decided third place in the open and match victory between Vladimir Fedoseev and Jorden van Foreest.

    First Erik van den Doel en Eltaj Safarli battled it out. Like yesterday, Van den Doel played very well but still didn’t make it somehow. In the first game he was winning when he knocked down some of Safarli’s pieces with his move 49…Ne2. Whether he was adjusting him in his own time or not, the Azeri, who had only 3 seconds left, immediately sat back, exclaiming ‘This is not possible!’ Chief arbiter Frans Peeters gave Safarli 10 seconds extra, and Van den Doel seemed to go on to win but blundered a rook just before move 50.

    Van den Doel (White) vs Safarli

    In the second game, Van den Doel was pressing with white, but when time ran low he sacked a piece. Safarli could perhaps even have won but decided the match with a perpetual.

    In the first game in the other tiebreak, Fedoseev started with 1.b3 and showed some real powerplay. However Van Foreest defended very coolly. Vladimir started looking for a new plan and ‘suddenly’ lost on time.

    In the second game, the Russian played a Hippopotamus with black. Now Van Foreest was pressing, winning a pawn and playing fast, natural moves. However when he won 2 more pawns with a fork trick the result was that his knight got caught on d8. It was still highly unclear with 4 pawns for a piece, but Fedoseev converted excellently with 10 seconds to go after just about every move.

    Game 3 again started with 1.b3. After a while Fedoseev won an exchange for a pawn, but this was the sign for Van Foreest to start an attack on the white king. Just when the Russian had his defence organized, Van Foreest blundered with …h4? and lost soon after.

    Fedoseev (White) vs Van Foreest

    Fedoseev was getting ready for a fourth game, but then he heard that he had already won the match! After the 1-1 tie it was sudden death. So he won the match 5-4.

    Four winners in Open

    The Open ended in a four-way tie today. Gadir Guseinov quite quickly beat Robert Baskin, while 17-year-old Valentin Buckels (who already became an IM at the FIDE congress on 6 October) drew P Karthikeyan. The battle between Roeland Pruijssers and his teammate Thomas Beerdsen would decide everything. Pruijssers was always better with white, and Beerdsen sacked an exchange to get some play. On move 35 White would have been winning if he had played 35.g4!. ‘I thought 35.f5 was winning too but I overlooked something’, Pruijssers said, and then it turned out just to be a stupid move. In the end I could play for an attack but that might also have misfired, so I opted for the perpetual.’

    Roeland Pruijssers (left) vs Thomas Beerdsen

    This meant that Guseinov, Beerdsen, Buckels and Pruijssers ended in a tie on 6½ point.

    Rakshitta Ravi lost today from a probably winning position, missing a WGM norm. The 13-year-old from Chennai still has a WIM-norm, but that was small consolation. With a draw, Machteld van Foreest (11) drew even with her, as well as Elena Tomilova and Sonja Maria Bluhm as the highest-ending woman players, all on plus-1!

    The rating prize goes to FM Frans Konings, who ended a wonderful tournament on a 6/9 score.

     
  • Amin and Kryakvin proceed to finals

    Amin and Kryakvin proceed to finals

    A nice ‘leftover’ from yesterday

    Here is a delayed message from yesterday’s round, about the game between Dutchman Maurice Schippers and 14-year-old Norwegian talent Jens Ingebretsen, who by the way is doing excellently so far with 4/7.

    Schippers – Ingebretsen

    Black played 51…Qg5+ here and the game ended in a draw.

    As Thomas Beerdsen pointed out, Black had an amazing win with 51…c1Q 52.d8Q Qcg5+ 53.Qxg5 hxg5+ 54.Kh5 Qe6!!

    55.Kxg5 e3! 56.fxe3. White has no useful queen moves! So Black wins with 56…Qg8+ or even 56…f2 first.

    Would you say Magnus would have spotted this at 14…?

     

     
    Some hiccups

    The 5th round of the matches has started, but there are technical problems with the live boards. Vladimir Fedoseev opened with 1.e4, Van Foreest replied 1…c5 and after 2.Nf3 d6 Fedoseev thought for a while before playing 3.d4. After 3…cxd4 4.Nxd4 Nf6 5.Nc3 a6 the Russian started to think again for several minutes. During those minutes Sam Shankland pointed out to the arbiters that the clock for his game wasn’t running, it turned out they hadn’t pushed the button hard enough. With chief arbiter Frans Peeters the time was ‘reconstructed’ (Peter Svidler took a walk because at one point, after Ne5 in the Fianchetto Grünfeld, he had thought for 2 minutes) and the game continued. Only after this did Fedoseev decide on 6.h3.

    Needless to say we’re doing everything we can to show you the games online games again!

    Semi-finals and 8th round Open

    Today the semi-finals of the Open started. Bassem Amin is playing Eltaj Safarli (a Scotch game) and Erik van den Doel confronted Dmitry Kryakvin with a London System.

    Unfortunately Roel Hamblok had to withdraw from the tournament, which means that his opponent, 13-year-old Rakshitta Ravi from Chennai, has no opponent today. It didn’t have any consequences for a possible WFM title, as she has already passed the 2200 border earlier this year. ‘But I didn’t apply for it’, the young Indian girl said. ‘I want to obtain the WIM title.’ She can do this tomorrow, in the last round of this event. Probably the only thing she needs for this is a titled opponent, and since she will have 5/8 after today this chance is quite large.

    Rakshitta Ravi in yesterday’s round, sitting beside the opponent she should have been playing today, Roel Hamblok

    Rakshitta has made WIM norms earlier this year in Cappelle-la-Grande (March) and in Pardubice (July). She will be playing more tournaments in Europe after this. ‘I have full-time leave from school and I make my exams in writing’, she explained.

    Sokolov: ‘Fedoseev-Van Foreest – a thematic match’

    Commentator GM Ivan Sokolov called the contest between Vladimir Fedoseev and Jorden van Foreest ‘a thematic match’.

    Commentator Ivan Sokolov

    Today the Russian opted for Fischer’s move 6.h3 against the Najdorf move 5…a6, which has a less good reputation in the Scheveningen. So, Jorden replied not 6…e6 but 6…g6, to turn it into a not-too-dangerous Dragon for Black. After 12.Nd5 the former Dutch champion allowed the damaging of his pawn structure by the capture on f6. Now Black’s only weakness is d6, but he does have active play on the half-open c- and e-files for it. Sokolov explained that if Black had taken on d5 himself, then after 13.exd5 Bxd4 14.Qxd4 Black does have the half-open c-file again, but it is White who has the e-file, with pressure on the e7-pawn, and eventually he can push his h-pawn to harass the lone black king.

    Fedoseev (left) vs Van Foreest

    Ivan had expected something sharper from Shankland, in view of his match situation, than the Fianchetto against Svidler’s Slav/Grünfeld set-up. 8…b6 is a move Magnus Carlsen has played, but it’s less well known than 8…e6 wih the idea …Nfd7, which was played 5 or 6 times by Kasparov against Karpov in their World Championship matches. Even though White played 7.Ne5 and later 13.Nf3, as well as 10.Qa4 and later 14.Qd1, he still had a small development advantage as Black could not well play …Nc6 due to e2-e4, with complications that often favour White. An interesting fight ‘under the surface’ for the centre.

    Shankland (left) vs Svidler

    Semi-finals update

    Bassem Amin has built up a good edge against Eltaj Safarli, mainly because of his pressure on the d5 isolani. Van den Doel’s London System has yielded him, quite characteristically for this line, somewhat freer play but Black seems to have no worries as he is very solid.

    Fedoseev-Van Foreest looks drawish

    In this game, Black’s weak d6-pawn has now been exchanged for White’s weak e4-pawn, and as a result the endgame looks pretty drawish. But we know for sure that Fedoseev (or perhaps both players?) will be trying some more.

    Stefan Kuipers fools himself

    Stefan Kuipers, the ‘Best of the Rest’ from the open last year, won’t be able to repeat that success himself. Today he tried to fool Indian IM P Karthikeyan, but instead got fooled himself.

    Kuipers-Karthikeyan

    Coming from the Tiger’s Modern Black is already doing quite well here, for example because 15.Qxd6?? is not possible as the queen is lost after 15…e5 and 16…Nc8. But Kuipers saw another tactical trick in the position:

    15.dxc5? dxc5 16.Bxc5? Nxc5 17.Bxb5+

    With queen plus 2 pawns for rook + 2 pieces, that was the idea. However when you calculate deeply, sometimes you overlook simple things…

    17…Ncd7 0-1

    Stefan Kuipers

    Some hidden possibilities in the Shankland-Svidler draw

    Today’s draw between Sam Shankland and Peter Svidler looked pretty placid, but under the surface horrible things had been going on.

    First, it seems that Shankland missed a very quick win:

    Shankland-Svidler

    Black’s last move, 13…Qe7, turns out to have been quite a mistake as some time after the game Shankland discovered 14.Nd1! with the threat of 15.Rc7, and after 14…b5 15.Qa5! is very strong, e.g. after 15…Nc6 16.Qc7 ‘Black can just resign’, Shankland sighed. ‘It seems that we’re not in the best shape.’

    Svidler: ‘Now, after 14.Qd1, indeed I cannot play 14…Nc6 because of 15.e4, so I wanted to play 14…Rc8 and …Nf6.

    14…Rc8

    15.Qd2

    After this move the position was just completely dead, according to both players. Svidler: ‘I was panicking here because I saw some crazy lines. For example, 15.e4 dxe4 16.Ng5 and here I had been planning 16…f5 but it turns out that 17.Ncxe4 is more or less winning.’ After 17…Rxc1 18.Rxc1 fxe4 19.Nxe4 Black has no good moves, e.g. 19…Nc6 20.Nd6 or 19… h6 20. Rc7 Bd5 21.Nc3 Bxg2 22.Kxg2 g5 23.Qf3.

    The players also talked about 17.Qb3 Re8 18.Bf1 but here Black is OK after 18…b5 or even better 18…Kh8.

    Instead of 16…f5, however, 16…Nc6 is playable, e.g. 17.Ncxe4 e5 ‘and I thought this was bad for me, but it seems to be OK’, Svidler concluded.

    Another, still crazier idea he had seen was 15.Nxd5!? exd5 16.Rxc8+ Bxc8 17.Rc1 Bb7 18.Rc7 Ra7 and Black is completely paralysed, but there is no immediate win in sight for White either. When the engine more or less confirmed his suspicions, Svidler said: ‘OK, I’m glad I’m apparently not a complete idiot.’

     

    Bassem Amin in the final!

    Bassem Amin has reached the final by outplaying Eltaj Safarli, who went wrong just after the opening.

    Amin-Safarli

    In this position, Safarli regretted having played 10…h6 (‘I should have gone 10…Re8’) after the reply 11.Be3 Bxe3 12.Qxe3,

    but here probably 12…d5 was too wild an attempt to free himself. 12…Re8 may still have been OK.

    After 13.0-0-0 Amin could press the isolani and eventually won, incidentally also passing the 2700 limit again.

    Bassem Amin (left) vs Eltaj Safarli

    The second semi-final

    The position in the game Erik van den Doel-Dmitry Kryakvin is equal but there is still some tension. The Dutch GM made his 40th move with 1.19 minute to go and then very coolly left the board to get a cup of coffee. He was apparently pretty sure he had indeed made 40 moves!

    Some Sokolov comments

    Ivan Sokolov was wondering why Vladimir Fedoseev kept playing on against Jorden van Foreest. ‘It wasn’t even necessary for Jorden to allow what is happening now, but it’s still a draw’, he said. About the Guseinov-Warmerdam draw he was also wondering: ‘Max had achieved just about everything Black wants in a Ruy Lopez’, our commentator said. ‘The only thing White had was 200 Elo points more. If he ever wants to beat these guys, now is the time. Or does he want to beat them from a bad position?’

    Max Warmerdam (left) during his game with teammate Thomas Beerdsen yesterday

    Buckels and Beerdsen lead, Pruijssers may join them

    German aspiring IM Valentin Buckels is leading after a good victory against P Iniyan, together with Thomas Beerdsen who beat his teammate Nico Zwirs after gaining a ‘small exchange’. Roeland Pruijssers is on his way to joining these two leaders. He was under pressure by Eelke de Boer for a while, but then the young player from Groningen slackened, and lost an exchange. He still had some compensation for a while, but things seem to be very much going Pruijssers’ way now.

    Valentin Buckels (17)

    Playoff Kryakvin and Van den Doel

    The second semi-final, between Erik van den Doel and Dmitry Kryakvin, ended in a draw. The playoff will take place in the Wedding Room of the town hall: Kryakvin starts with white, minimally 2 blitz games, 3 minutes each and 2 seconds added per move!

    Kryakvin reaches the final!

    After a nerve-wracking playoff Dmitry Kryakvin has reached the final, where he will be facing Bassem Amin with black. Erik van den Doel certainly had his chances though. After a difficult opening in Game 1, which took him quite some time,

    … the Dutchman came back in the game and even outplayed his Russian rival in the endgame. But when he had gained a pawn for which Kryakvin had to give his knight, a theoretical draw ensued in which Black’s extra bishop was not enough for the win.

    In game 2 a London System came on the board just like in the regular game between these two players today.

    Van den Doel had a little something with white, but again used up too much time and when he could only just defend his two bishops with his rook, his time had already run out.

    Kryakvin and his wife Elena Tomilova were over the moon. ‘So much money depending on one blitz game!’ Dmitry gasped.

    Another draw in the FF match

    The draw between Vladimir Fedoseev and Jorden van Foreest today was a pretty bloodless affair. ‘I should have played 9.a4 instead of 9.0-0 to prevent his counterplay with …b7-b5’, Fedoseev said. ‘His 12…Bb7 in reply to my 12.Nd5 was good, he just gets immediate pressure on my e4-pawn. After that it was just probably 0.00 all the time.’

    Tomorrow Jorden can take a last shot at winning this tough match, in his final White game.

    Vladimir Fedoseev (left) and a small piece of Jorden van Foreest

    Svidler still leading, Amin and Kryakvin play final

    Today the excitement mainly came from the very tense blitz playoff between Dmitry Kryakvin and Erik van den Doel. In the end the Russian won 1½-½ and so qualified for the final against Bassem Amin, who beat Eltaj Safarli earlier today.

    There was not a lot of excitement in the 6.h3 Sicilian of Vladimir Fedoseev and Jorden Fedoseev, where the Dutchman equalized pretty easily with black with a few to-the-point moves. Then Fedoseev tried for a long time to squeeze water out of a stone, but he didn’t manage: the score in this match is 2½-2½ going into the last round.

    The game Shankland-Svidler also became a quite placid affair after White’s 15th move, but one move earlier the American had missed an enormous chance, as he discovered later. Svidler had seen a few wild and crazy lines, but alas none of those came on the board: also a draw, and a 3-2 lead for Svidler.

  • Amin en Kryakvin bereiken Finale

    Amin en Kryakvin bereiken Finale

    A nice ‘leftover’ from yesterday

    Here is a delayed message from yesterday’s round, about the game between Dutchman Maurice Schippers and 14-year-old Norwegian talent Jens Ingebretsen, who by the way is doing excellently so far with 4/7.

    Schippers – Ingebretsen

    Black played 51…Qg5+ here and the game ended in a draw.

    As Thomas Beerdsen pointed out, Black had an amazing win with 51…c1Q 52.d8Q Qcg5+ 53.Qxg5 hxg5+ 54.Kh5 Qe6!!

    55.Kxg5 e3! 56.fxe3. White has no useful queen moves! So Black wins with 56…Qg8+ or even 56…f2 first.

    Would you say Magnus would have spotted this at 14…?

     

     
    Some hiccups

    The 5th round of the matches has started, but there are technical problems with the live boards. Vladimir Fedoseev opened with 1.e4, Van Foreest replied 1…c5 and after 2.Nf3 d6 Fedoseev thought for a while before playing 3.d4. After 3…cxd4 4.Nxd4 Nf6 5.Nc3 a6 the Russian started to think again for several minutes. During those minutes Sam Shankland pointed out to the arbiters that the clock for his game wasn’t running, it turned out they hadn’t pushed the button hard enough. With chief arbiter Frans Peeters the time was ‘reconstructed’ (Peter Svidler took a walk because at one point, after Ne5 in the Fianchetto Grünfeld, he had thought for 2 minutes) and the game continued. Only after this did Fedoseev decide on 6.h3.

    Needless to say we’re doing everything we can to show you the games online games again!

    Semi-finals and 8th round Open

    Today the semi-finals of the Open started. Bassem Amin is playing Eltaj Safarli (a Scotch game) and Erik van den Doel confronted Dmitry Kryakvin with a London System.

    Unfortunately Roel Hamblok had to withdraw from the tournament, which means that his opponent, 13-year-old Rakshitta Ravi from Chennai, has no opponent today. It didn’t have any consequences for a possible WFM title, as she has already passed the 2200 border earlier this year. ‘But I didn’t apply for it’, the young Indian girl said. ‘I want to obtain the WIM title.’ She can do this tomorrow, in the last round of this event. Probably the only thing she needs for this is a titled opponent, and since she will have 5/8 after today this chance is quite large.

    Rakshitta Ravi in yesterday’s round, sitting beside the opponent she should have been playing today, Roel Hamblok

    Rakshitta has made WIM norms earlier this year in Cappelle-la-Grande (March) and in Pardubice (July). She will be playing more tournaments in Europe after this. ‘I have full-time leave from school and I make my exams in writing’, she explained.

    Sokolov: ‘Fedoseev-Van Foreest – a thematic match’

    Commentator GM Ivan Sokolov called the contest between Vladimir Fedoseev and Jorden van Foreest ‘a thematic match’.

    Commentator Ivan Sokolov

    Today the Russian opted for Fischer’s move 6.h3 against the Najdorf move 5…a6, which has a less good reputation in the Scheveningen. So, Jorden replied not 6…e6 but 6…g6, to turn it into a not-too-dangerous Dragon for Black. After 12.Nd5 the former Dutch champion allowed the damaging of his pawn structure by the capture on f6. Now Black’s only weakness is d6, but he does have active play on the half-open c- and e-files for it. Sokolov explained that if Black had taken on d5 himself, then after 13.exd5 Bxd4 14.Qxd4 Black does have the half-open c-file again, but it is White who has the e-file, with pressure on the e7-pawn, and eventually he can push his h-pawn to harass the lone black king.

    Fedoseev (left) vs Van Foreest

    Ivan had expected something sharper from Shankland, in view of his match situation, than the Fianchetto against Svidler’s Slav/Grünfeld set-up. 8…b6 is a move Magnus Carlsen has played, but it’s less well known than 8…e6 wih the idea …Nfd7, which was played 5 or 6 times by Kasparov against Karpov in their World Championship matches. Even though White played 7.Ne5 and later 13.Nf3, as well as 10.Qa4 and later 14.Qd1, he still had a small development advantage as Black could not well play …Nc6 due to e2-e4, with complications that often favour White. An interesting fight ‘under the surface’ for the centre.

    Shankland (left) vs Svidler

    Semi-finals update

    Bassem Amin has built up a good edge against Eltaj Safarli, mainly because of his pressure on the d5 isolani. Van den Doel’s London System has yielded him, quite characteristically for this line, somewhat freer play but Black seems to have no worries as he is very solid.

    Fedoseev-Van Foreest looks drawish

    In this game, Black’s weak d6-pawn has now been exchanged for White’s weak e4-pawn, and as a result the endgame looks pretty drawish. But we know for sure that Fedoseev (or perhaps both players?) will be trying some more.

    Stefan Kuipers fools himself

    Stefan Kuipers, the ‘Best of the Rest’ from the open last year, won’t be able to repeat that success himself. Today he tried to fool Indian IM P Karthikeyan, but instead got fooled himself.

    Kuipers-Karthikeyan

    Coming from the Tiger’s Modern Black is already doing quite well here, for example because 15.Qxd6?? is not possible as the queen is lost after 15…e5 and 16…Nc8. But Kuipers saw another tactical trick in the position:

    15.dxc5? dxc5 16.Bxc5? Nxc5 17.Bxb5+

    With queen plus 2 pawns for rook + 2 pieces, that was the idea. However when you calculate deeply, sometimes you overlook simple things…

    17…Ncd7 0-1

    Stefan Kuipers

    Some hidden possibilities in the Shankland-Svidler draw

    Today’s draw between Sam Shankland and Peter Svidler looked pretty placid, but under the surface horrible things had been going on.

    First, it seems that Shankland missed a very quick win:

    Shankland-Svidler

    Black’s last move, 13…Qe7, turns out to have been quite a mistake as some time after the game Shankland discovered 14.Nd1! with the threat of 15.Rc7, and after 14…b5 15.Qa5! is very strong, e.g. after 15…Nc6 16.Qc7 ‘Black can just resign’, Shankland sighed. ‘It seems that we’re not in the best shape.’

    Svidler: ‘Now, after 14.Qd1, indeed I cannot play 14…Nc6 because of 15.e4, so I wanted to play 14…Rc8 and …Nf6.

    14…Rc8

    15.Qd2

    After this move the position was just completely dead, according to both players. Svidler: ‘I was panicking here because I saw some crazy lines. For example, 15.e4 dxe4 16.Ng5 and here I had been planning 16…f5 but it turns out that 17.Ncxe4 is more or less winning.’ After 17…Rxc1 18.Rxc1 fxe4 19.Nxe4 Black has no good moves, e.g. 19…Nc6 20.Nd6 or 19… h6 20. Rc7 Bd5 21.Nc3 Bxg2 22.Kxg2 g5 23.Qf3.

    The players also talked about 17.Qb3 Re8 18.Bf1 but here Black is OK after 18…b5 or even better 18…Kh8.

    Instead of 16…f5, however, 16…Nc6 is playable, e.g. 17.Ncxe4 e5 ‘and I thought this was bad for me, but it seems to be OK’, Svidler concluded.

    Another, still crazier idea he had seen was 15.Nxd5!? exd5 16.Rxc8+ Bxc8 17.Rc1 Bb7 18.Rc7 Ra7 and Black is completely paralysed, but there is no immediate win in sight for White either. When the engine more or less confirmed his suspicions, Svidler said: ‘OK, I’m glad I’m apparently not a complete idiot.’

     

    Bassem Amin in the final!

    Bassem Amin has reached the final by outplaying Eltaj Safarli, who went wrong just after the opening.

    Amin-Safarli

    In this position, Safarli regretted having played 10…h6 (‘I should have gone 10…Re8’) after the reply 11.Be3 Bxe3 12.Qxe3,

    but here probably 12…d5 was too wild an attempt to free himself. 12…Re8 may still have been OK.

    After 13.0-0-0 Amin could press the isolani and eventually won, incidentally also passing the 2700 limit again.

    Bassem Amin (left) vs Eltaj Safarli

    The second semi-final

    The position in the game Erik van den Doel-Dmitry Kryakvin is equal but there is still some tension. The Dutch GM made his 40th move with 1.19 minute to go and then very coolly left the board to get a cup of coffee. He was apparently pretty sure he had indeed made 40 moves!

    Some Sokolov comments

    Ivan Sokolov was wondering why Vladimir Fedoseev kept playing on against Jorden van Foreest. ‘It wasn’t even necessary for Jorden to allow what is happening now, but it’s still a draw’, he said. About the Guseinov-Warmerdam draw he was also wondering: ‘Max had achieved just about everything Black wants in a Ruy Lopez’, our commentator said. ‘The only thing White had was 200 Elo points more. If he ever wants to beat these guys, now is the time. Or does he want to beat them from a bad position?’

    Max Warmerdam (left) during his game with teammate Thomas Beerdsen yesterday

    Buckels and Beerdsen lead, Pruijssers may join them

    German aspiring IM Valentin Buckels is leading after a good victory against P Iniyan, together with Thomas Beerdsen who beat his teammate Nico Zwirs after gaining a ‘small exchange’. Roeland Pruijssers is on his way to joining these two leaders. He was under pressure by Eelke de Boer for a while, but then the young player from Groningen slackened, and lost an exchange. He still had some compensation for a while, but things seem to be very much going Pruijssers’ way now.

    Valentin Buckels (17)

    Playoff Kryakvin and Van den Doel

    The second semi-final, between Erik van den Doel and Dmitry Kryakvin, ended in a draw. The playoff will take place in the Wedding Room of the town hall: Kryakvin starts with white, minimally 2 blitz games, 3 minutes each and 2 seconds added per move!

    Kryakvin reaches the final!

    After a nerve-wracking playoff Dmitry Kryakvin has reached the final, where he will be facing Bassem Amin with black. Erik van den Doel certainly had his chances though. After a difficult opening in Game 1, which took him quite some time,

    … the Dutchman came back in the game and even outplayed his Russian rival in the endgame. But when he had gained a pawn for which Kryakvin had to give his knight, a theoretical draw ensued in which Black’s extra bishop was not enough for the win.

    In game 2 a London System came on the board just like in the regular game between these two players today.

    Van den Doel had a little something with white, but again used up too much time and when he could only just defend his two bishops with his rook, his time had already run out.

    Kryakvin and his wife Elena Tomilova were over the moon. ‘So much money depending on one blitz game!’ Dmitry gasped.

    Another draw in the FF match

    The draw between Vladimir Fedoseev and Jorden van Foreest today was a pretty bloodless affair. ‘I should have played 9.a4 instead of 9.0-0 to prevent his counterplay with …b7-b5’, Fedoseev said. ‘His 12…Bb7 in reply to my 12.Nd5 was good, he just gets immediate pressure on my e4-pawn. After that it was just probably 0.00 all the time.’

    Tomorrow Jorden can take a last shot at winning this tough match, in his final White game.

    Vladimir Fedoseev (left) and a small piece of Jorden van Foreest

    Svidler still leading, Amin and Kryakvin play final

    Today the excitement mainly came from the very tense blitz playoff between Dmitry Kryakvin and Erik van den Doel. In the end the Russian won 1½-½ and so qualified for the final against Bassem Amin, who beat Eltaj Safarli earlier today.

    There was not a lot of excitement in the 6.h3 Sicilian of Vladimir Fedoseev and Jorden Fedoseev, where the Dutchman equalized pretty easily with black with a few to-the-point moves. Then Fedoseev tried for a long time to squeeze water out of a stone, but he didn’t manage: the score in this match is 2½-2½ going into the last round.

    The game Shankland-Svidler also became a quite placid affair after White’s 15th move, but one move earlier the American had missed an enormous chance, as he discovered later. Svidler had seen a few wild and crazy lines, but alas none of those came on the board: also a draw, and a 3-2 lead for Svidler.

  • Report round 7 Open and round 4 Matches

    Report round 7 Open and round 4 Matches

    Day 6 has started!

    Round 7 of the Open and round 4 of the matches have just started.

    This time Peter Svidler opted for 1.Nf3 as the first move, and continued after 1…d5 with the currently quite popular and ‘poisonous’ 2.e3.

    In the other match, again the Najdorf came on the board. Unlike the 2nd game, where he played 7.f4 after 6.Be2 e6, Jorden van Foreest has now played 7.Be3.

     

     

    Two short draws in Open

    Today is an important day in the Open. After round 7, the first 4 players will qualify for the semifinals, which will be played tomorrow.

    We already have a few very quick draws: between Frenchman Hector Giacomini and Luuk van Kooten, and between Jonas Hilwerda and Peter Hulshof. At the moment there are some technical problems with boards 35-39. We will provide the game scores as soon as possible.

    Jonas Hilwerda

    No short draws after all!

    Hector Giacomini and Luuk van Kooten as well as Jonas Hilwerda and Peter Hulshof are still playing! The 2 draws I wrote about were also a technical glitch.

    Sokolov: ‘Black is OK – twice’

    Today’s commentator Ivan Sokolov gave a very instructive analysis of the openings in both matches. He argued that in the Scheveningen Sicilian that came on the board in Van Foreest-Fedoseev, Black’s play may be even easier than White’s since he has a clear plan: …Rac8, …Rae8 and …d6-d5.

    In Svidler-Shankland, White kept his d-pawn on d2 for a while because he may want a set-up with b2-b3, Bb2 and g2-g4, as was for example played in the recent important Olympiad game Nepomniachtchi-Bacrot (1-0). Shankland prevented this with 4…dxc4, opting for a Queen’s Gambit Accepted set-up where White’s knight is not great on c3. After …b7-b5 White wants to play a2-a4, but in this case after …b5-b4 the knight has to go back to b1 and he loses several tempi. When Svidler played 8.d4 after all, Black had no problems. With the later 11.e4 White aims for e4-e5, but the American’s reaction 11…cxd4 and 12…Bd6 was again spot on. Sokolov: ‘With the rook on d1 White now cannot play f2-f4 and has to do something against the threat on h2.

    Great stuff!

    They’re going for it!

    In the Open, some experts expected a short draw on top board because both Bassem Amin and Erik van den Doel have the best TPR and have good chances of qualifying for the semi-finals. But they seem to be going for it, although in a quite careful way.

     

    IM David Miedema suddenly seems to have a strong attack against Tijana Blagojevic. In the following position the Serbian WIM opened the floodgates:

    17…e5?

    Now White can give a deadly check with 18.Bd5+ and then attack Black’s f5 weakness with 19.g4 – the computer even suggests 18.g4 immediately.

    Tijana Blagojevic

     

    A feint by Van Foreest?

    There are already lots of interesting tactics possible in the game Van Foreest-Fedoseev.

    Tournament director Loek van Wely suggested the option of 13.Ndxb5 axb5 14.Nxb5 Qb8 15.Nxd6+ Kf8 here, with three pawns for the knight.

    After 13…O-O 14.Bg5 Rfc8 15.Bd3 Rab8, here, instead, Van Foreest started an attack on the black king in gung-ho style with 16.Rh3 Ba8 17.Rg3 Ne5 18.Bh6 Ne8

    and now thought for a while.

    Would Jorden sac on g7? No! He has retreated his bishop.

     

    Draw on board 1 Open

    Well, of course it often happens that we write something on the blog which is refuted soon after. Bassem Amin and Erik van den Doel have made a fairly quick draw, and now the others can try to play catch-up.

    A mistake by Shankland?

    When Peter Svidler has a red face, walks around at a furious pace and sits with his head in his hands at the board, things seem to look terrible for him. But in the 8-fold Russian champion’s case this usually means he is winning! He has invaded Black’s weakened kingside with his queen. It looks extremely dangerous for Shankland. On move 19 he could have kept everything covered with 19…Be7 instead of the sharp 19…hxg3!?. Now the g-file has also been opened, and Sokolov ventured in the commentary room that Black won’t survive this for long.

    Peter Svidler

    Safarli and Kryakvin also draw

    Board 2 of the Open has also ended in a fairly quick draw. Nothing special, Dmitry Kryakvin whispered in the playing room.

    Eltaj Safarli (left) and Dmitry Kryakvin

    Apeldoorn teammates Max Warmerdam and Thomas Beerdsen have also already signed the peace treaty.

     

     

     

    Van Foreest loses a piece

    Jorden van Foreest may be regretting that he put his bishop on g5 instead of sacrificing it on g7. Now the bishop is closed in anyway and he has put it on h6, hoping to draw compensation from Black’s shattered kingside.

    Jorden van Foreest… his hand close to the piteous c1-bishop

    Svidler analyses his win

    Peter Svidler just won a brilliant game, and he went to the commentary room to explain what happened.

    Svidler-Shankland

    19…hxg3?!

    Svidler: ‘Here he has the clever move 19… Be7! to bail out: after 20.Bxh4 he has 20…e5. Then I can consider 21.Nf5 Bc5+ (21… Rxd2 22. Nxe7+ Kh7 23. Rxd2 Qa7+ 24. Kg2 Qe3

    followed by taking on e4 looks even better for Black, PB) 22. Rxc5 Rxd2 23. Rxd2 Qa7 and my rook is caught.’

    20.Bxf6 gxf6 21.Qh6

    ‘If I can get this I just have to go for it.’

    21…Be5 22.Kh1! g2+

    Svidler wasn’t sure about 22… f5 23.Rg1 Bg7 24.Qh5 and now 24…fxe4, but after 25.Rxg3 exf3 26.Rxg7+! Black just gets mated.

    23.Kxg2 Bxd4 24.Nxd4 Qe5

    25.Kh1

    Svidler: ‘I calculated 25.Nf5 exf5 26.Kh1 Rxd1+ 27.Rxd1 Nh7 28.Bxf7+ and White wins, but I panicked when I saw the immediate

    26…Nh7. Of course 27.Bxf7+ also wins here, e.g. 27…Kxf7 28.Qxh7+ Ke6 29.exf5+

    25…Bxe4

    ‘This move I had completely overlooked, but luckily it didn’t cost me anything; White is still winning.’

    26.Rg1+ Bg6 27.Nxe6!

    27…fxe6

    ‘Here there is a fantastic variation: 27…Nxe6 28.Rce1 Qf5 29.Bxe6 Qxf3+ 30.Rg2 Qe4 31.Rxe4 Rd1+ 32.Rg1 and now I am again in luck as the mating move 32…Be4 is not legal!’

    28.Rxg6+

    There are many wins here, including the flashy 28.Rc7, but now Black just gets mated.

    28…Nxg6 29.Qxg6+ Kf8 30.Qh6+ Ke7 31.Qh7+

    And Black resigned because of 32.Rg1.

    Bravo!

    Van Foreest – Fedoseev seems a dead draw

    Van Foreest got enough compensation after his bishop was closed in, but on move 26 Fedoseev may have played not the best move.

    If, instead of taking on e4, he played 26…a5! Black could continue his kingside attack and would have been clearly better. After 26…Bxe4 Van Foreest had a relatively easy task of winning a couple of pawns and exchanging queens, leading to a drawn endgame.

    Fourth draw for Van Foreest and Fedoseev

    Also in the fourth match game Jorden van Foreest managed to draw after some hard work. Vladimir Fedoseev admitted that after 26…Bxe4 27.Nxe4 Qxe4 he had missed 28.f5!, which gives Black good compensation. Next, after 32.Qd5+ he thought he might have tried 32…Kh7 when Black is more active than in the game.

    The players agreed that the sac 19.Bxg7 Nxg7 20.Qh6 Bf8 21.f4 would have been a better chance. ‘This is complicated, and looks quite interesting’, said Fedoseev. Van Foreest thought that after the move 26…a5! that we mentioned in the previous blog it would have been ‘game over’.

     

    Amin, Van den Doel, Safarli and Kryakvin go to semi-finals

    The games on all six top boards ended in draws, which means that the two top boards, Bassem Amin, Erik van den Doel, Eltaj Safarli and Dmitry Kryakvin go on to the semi-finals which will start tomorrow.

    The most tense game was the one between P Shyaamnikhil and Gadir Guseinov. ‘I was worde after the opening’, the Indian IM said, ’then it became complicated, but I managed to equalize.’ A win might have put him into contention for the semi-finals, ‘but I think I would have stayed in the regular tournament’, Shyaamnikhil said, ‘as I want to fight for a GM norm. This wouldn’t have been possible in the semi-finals since I have played Bassem Amin already earlier in the tournament.’

    Indian IM P Shyaamnikhil

    Svidler takes the lead

    Peter Svidler took the lead in his match with Sam Shankland today with a brilliant win. In the commentary room he was beaming and showed the audience and commentator Ivan Sokolov a number of brilliant variations. ‘But still I missed something also in this game’, said the super-GM. Jorden van Foreest again had to pull out all the stops to achieve a draw against Vladimir Fedoseev, but when the other Russian super-GM missed something on move 26 the Dutchman again managed to escape by a hair’s breadth.

    In the Open, things were pretty quiet today at the top boards. Six draws were registered, which meant that the standings at the top of the list remained unchanged and Bassem Amin, Erik van den Doel, Eltaj Safarli and Dmitry Kryakvin qualified for what promises to be an exciting semi-final and final in the coming days.

     

     

     

  • Verslag Ronde 7 Open en Ronde 4 Matches

    Verslag Ronde 7 Open en Ronde 4 Matches

    Day 6 has started!

    Round 7 of the Open and round 4 of the matches have just started.

    This time Peter Svidler opted for 1.Nf3 as the first move, and continued after 1…d5 with the currently quite popular and ‘poisonous’ 2.e3.

    In the other match, again the Najdorf came on the board. Unlike the 2nd game, where he played 7.f4 after 6.Be2 e6, Jorden van Foreest has now played 7.Be3.

     

     

    Two short draws in Open

    Today is an important day in the Open. After round 7, the first 4 players will qualify for the semifinals, which will be played tomorrow.

    We already have a few very quick draws: between Frenchman Hector Giacomini and Luuk van Kooten, and between Jonas Hilwerda and Peter Hulshof. At the moment there are some technical problems with boards 35-39. We will provide the game scores as soon as possible.

    Jonas Hilwerda

    No short draws after all!

    Hector Giacomini and Luuk van Kooten as well as Jonas Hilwerda and Peter Hulshof are still playing! The 2 draws I wrote about were also a technical glitch.

    Sokolov: ‘Black is OK – twice’

    Today’s commentator Ivan Sokolov gave a very instructive analysis of the openings in both matches. He argued that in the Scheveningen Sicilian that came on the board in Van Foreest-Fedoseev, Black’s play may be even easier than White’s since he has a clear plan: …Rac8, …Rae8 and …d6-d5.

    In Svidler-Shankland, White kept his d-pawn on d2 for a while because he may want a set-up with b2-b3, Bb2 and g2-g4, as was for example played in the recent important Olympiad game Nepomniachtchi-Bacrot (1-0). Shankland prevented this with 4…dxc4, opting for a Queen’s Gambit Accepted set-up where White’s knight is not great on c3. After …b7-b5 White wants to play a2-a4, but in this case after …b5-b4 the knight has to go back to b1 and he loses several tempi. When Svidler played 8.d4 after all, Black had no problems. With the later 11.e4 White aims for e4-e5, but the American’s reaction 11…cxd4 and 12…Bd6 was again spot on. Sokolov: ‘With the rook on d1 White now cannot play f2-f4 and has to do something against the threat on h2.

    Great stuff!

    They’re going for it!

    In the Open, some experts expected a short draw on top board because both Bassem Amin and Erik van den Doel have the best TPR and have good chances of qualifying for the semi-finals. But they seem to be going for it, although in a quite careful way.

     

    IM David Miedema suddenly seems to have a strong attack against Tijana Blagojevic. In the following position the Serbian WIM opened the floodgates:

    17…e5?

    Now White can give a deadly check with 18.Bd5+ and then attack Black’s f5 weakness with 19.g4 – the computer even suggests 18.g4 immediately.

    Tijana Blagojevic

     

    A feint by Van Foreest?

    There are already lots of interesting tactics possible in the game Van Foreest-Fedoseev.

    Tournament director Loek van Wely suggested the option of 13.Ndxb5 axb5 14.Nxb5 Qb8 15.Nxd6+ Kf8 here, with three pawns for the knight.

    After 13…O-O 14.Bg5 Rfc8 15.Bd3 Rab8, here, instead, Van Foreest started an attack on the black king in gung-ho style with 16.Rh3 Ba8 17.Rg3 Ne5 18.Bh6 Ne8

    and now thought for a while.

    Would Jorden sac on g7? No! He has retreated his bishop.

     

    Draw on board 1 Open

    Well, of course it often happens that we write something on the blog which is refuted soon after. Bassem Amin and Erik van den Doel have made a fairly quick draw, and now the others can try to play catch-up.

    A mistake by Shankland?

    When Peter Svidler has a red face, walks around at a furious pace and sits with his head in his hands at the board, things seem to look terrible for him. But in the 8-fold Russian champion’s case this usually means he is winning! He has invaded Black’s weakened kingside with his queen. It looks extremely dangerous for Shankland. On move 19 he could have kept everything covered with 19…Be7 instead of the sharp 19…hxg3!?. Now the g-file has also been opened, and Sokolov ventured in the commentary room that Black won’t survive this for long.

    Peter Svidler

    Safarli and Kryakvin also draw

    Board 2 of the Open has also ended in a fairly quick draw. Nothing special, Dmitry Kryakvin whispered in the playing room.

    Eltaj Safarli (left) and Dmitry Kryakvin

    Apeldoorn teammates Max Warmerdam and Thomas Beerdsen have also already signed the peace treaty.

     

     

     

    Van Foreest loses a piece

    Jorden van Foreest may be regretting that he put his bishop on g5 instead of sacrificing it on g7. Now the bishop is closed in anyway and he has put it on h6, hoping to draw compensation from Black’s shattered kingside.

    Jorden van Foreest… his hand close to the piteous c1-bishop

    Svidler analyses his win

    Peter Svidler just won a brilliant game, and he went to the commentary room to explain what happened.

    Svidler-Shankland

    19…hxg3?!

    Svidler: ‘Here he has the clever move 19… Be7! to bail out: after 20.Bxh4 he has 20…e5. Then I can consider 21.Nf5 Bc5+ (21… Rxd2 22. Nxe7+ Kh7 23. Rxd2 Qa7+ 24. Kg2 Qe3

    followed by taking on e4 looks even better for Black, PB) 22. Rxc5 Rxd2 23. Rxd2 Qa7 and my rook is caught.’

    20.Bxf6 gxf6 21.Qh6

    ‘If I can get this I just have to go for it.’

    21…Be5 22.Kh1! g2+

    Svidler wasn’t sure about 22… f5 23.Rg1 Bg7 24.Qh5 and now 24…fxe4, but after 25.Rxg3 exf3 26.Rxg7+! Black just gets mated.

    23.Kxg2 Bxd4 24.Nxd4 Qe5

    25.Kh1

    Svidler: ‘I calculated 25.Nf5 exf5 26.Kh1 Rxd1+ 27.Rxd1 Nh7 28.Bxf7+ and White wins, but I panicked when I saw the immediate

    26…Nh7. Of course 27.Bxf7+ also wins here, e.g. 27…Kxf7 28.Qxh7+ Ke6 29.exf5+

    25…Bxe4

    ‘This move I had completely overlooked, but luckily it didn’t cost me anything; White is still winning.’

    26.Rg1+ Bg6 27.Nxe6!

    27…fxe6

    ‘Here there is a fantastic variation: 27…Nxe6 28.Rce1 Qf5 29.Bxe6 Qxf3+ 30.Rg2 Qe4 31.Rxe4 Rd1+ 32.Rg1 and now I am again in luck as the mating move 32…Be4 is not legal!’

    28.Rxg6+

    There are many wins here, including the flashy 28.Rc7, but now Black just gets mated.

    28…Nxg6 29.Qxg6+ Kf8 30.Qh6+ Ke7 31.Qh7+

    And Black resigned because of 32.Rg1.

    Bravo!

    Van Foreest – Fedoseev seems a dead draw

    Van Foreest got enough compensation after his bishop was closed in, but on move 26 Fedoseev may have played not the best move.

    If, instead of taking on e4, he played 26…a5! Black could continue his kingside attack and would have been clearly better. After 26…Bxe4 Van Foreest had a relatively easy task of winning a couple of pawns and exchanging queens, leading to a drawn endgame.

    Fourth draw for Van Foreest and Fedoseev

    Also in the fourth match game Jorden van Foreest managed to draw after some hard work. Vladimir Fedoseev admitted that after 26…Bxe4 27.Nxe4 Qxe4 he had missed 28.f5!, which gives Black good compensation. Next, after 32.Qd5+ he thought he might have tried 32…Kh7 when Black is more active than in the game.

    The players agreed that the sac 19.Bxg7 Nxg7 20.Qh6 Bf8 21.f4 would have been a better chance. ‘This is complicated, and looks quite interesting’, said Fedoseev. Van Foreest thought that after the move 26…a5! that we mentioned in the previous blog it would have been ‘game over’.

     

    Amin, Van den Doel, Safarli and Kryakvin go to semi-finals

    The games on all six top boards ended in draws, which means that the two top boards, Bassem Amin, Erik van den Doel, Eltaj Safarli and Dmitry Kryakvin go on to the semi-finals which will start tomorrow.

    The most tense game was the one between P Shyaamnikhil and Gadir Guseinov. ‘I was worde after the opening’, the Indian IM said, ’then it became complicated, but I managed to equalize.’ A win might have put him into contention for the semi-finals, ‘but I think I would have stayed in the regular tournament’, Shyaamnikhil said, ‘as I want to fight for a GM norm. This wouldn’t have been possible in the semi-finals since I have played Bassem Amin already earlier in the tournament.’

    Indian IM P Shyaamnikhil

    Svidler takes the lead

    Peter Svidler took the lead in his match with Sam Shankland today with a brilliant win. In the commentary room he was beaming and showed the audience and commentator Ivan Sokolov a number of brilliant variations. ‘But still I missed something also in this game’, said the super-GM. Jorden van Foreest again had to pull out all the stops to achieve a draw against Vladimir Fedoseev, but when the other Russian super-GM missed something on move 26 the Dutchman again managed to escape by a hair’s breadth.

    In the Open, things were pretty quiet today at the top boards. Six draws were registered, which meant that the standings at the top of the list remained unchanged and Bassem Amin, Erik van den Doel, Eltaj Safarli and Dmitry Kryakvin qualified for what promises to be an exciting semi-final and final in the coming days.

     

     

     

  • Four leaders in Open after round 6

    Four leaders in Open after round 6

     

    Day off for match players

    There will be no regular messages on this blog during the afternoon. We are off to the Drents Museum in Assen for a meet&greet with the four match players Jorden van Foreest, Vladimir Fedoseev, Sam Shankland and Peter Svidler, as well as a meet&greet with actress Christine Namaganda from the movie ‘Queen of Katwe’ and an online rapid between Jorden van Foreest and Youth World Champion Parham Maghsoodloo from Iran.

    We’ll be back at the end of the afternoon!

     

     
     

    Van Foreest vs Maghsoodloo on Chess24

    In the first online rapid game with Junior World Champion Parham Maghsoodloo, in the Statenzaal at the Drents Museum in Assen, Jorden van Foreest was pushing for a win with white in a knight ending, but the 18-year-old Iranian cleverly held the draw. The second rapid game is under way. Jorden has opted for a Ruy Lopez with 3…g6.

     

    Replay the full game here: https://chess24.com/en/game/W_VMWM52S0WRPH135af8ig

    Maghsoodloo wins!

    In the second game, Jorden van Foreest sacrificed a pawn with black and got good compensation for it, but went wrong, and lost a second pawn and the game, so a 0.5-1.5 loss for the Dutchman!

     

    Replay game 2 at https://chess24.com/en/game/3i78–ZjTV2LiYhEmYOVcQ

    Tense draw on top board

    Back in the Hoogeveen town hall! In round 6 of the Open, the top board game started with a King’s Indian that looked sharp and promising. Dmitry Kryakvin had an edge with white for a long time. ‘He was better prepared than I, it was a crazy position’, said Amin afterwards. But Kryakvin didn’t take too much risk and Bassem Amin managed to keep things under control: a tense draw.

    Bassem Amin

    Risky play Safarli pays off

    Eltaj Safarli won a completely crazy game today. He took some big risks in the opening, a kind of Reversed London System, ‘because that’s what you have to do when you want to win.’ He thought the Indian’s 8.b3 was too slow, and went for the sharpest way to get counterplay. Safarli sacrificed a piece to keep White’s king in the middle, and the following mind-boggling position came on the board:

    Karthikeyan-Safarli

    23…Rxe5

    Now White can oppose on e3 with the rook. Better was 23…Nxe5! 24.Bh3 Qd6 with complete control.

    24.Re3 Qe7 25.Rxe5

    He should probably have swapped while he had the chance: 25.Bxd4 cxd4 (25…Nxd4 26.Rxe5 Qxe5 27.Bd3) 26.Rxf3 Rxf3 27.Nxf3 Re3 28.c5! and Black’s compensation starts to dwindle. 25…Nxe5 26.Qe3 Qf6 27.Bd3

    Now after 27.Bxd4 cxd4 the queen has to return and it’s totally unclear again. But moves like 27.Bh3 or 27.b4 were better.

    27…f2 28.Rf1 h6

    29.Be4?!

    Good was 29.Bb1! to meet 29…Ng4?? with 30.Qe8+.

    29…Ng4 30.Bd5+ Kf8 31.Qg3 ?! Qe5 32.Bxd4 Qxd4

    Black is taking over now. Even stronger was 32…cxd4 as then after 33.Kc1, 33…Qe3! is devastating.

    33.Kc1 Ne3?

    33…Qe3! – the Azeri GM likes his queen too much, who has done such a great job for him in this game.

    34.Rxf2 Nxd5

    35.Re2?

    Finally losing. White could save himself with 35.Rxf4+ Nxf4 36.Qf3, when he wins back the pawn. Even 35.Rf3!!, keeping all options open, was an equalizer. Now Black keeps the extra pawn and the pressure. Seven moves later Karthikeyan resigned.

     

    Van den Doel also wins

    Erik van den Doel achieved an important victory against Evgeny Romanov. The strong Russian GM may have regretted castling queenside on move 14, as after that things started to go downhill for him. Van den Doel first swapped the dark-squared bishops and then planted a knight on d6, which was removed by an exchange sac. But it seems that Black never got enough compensation for the exchange, and late in the endgame Van den Doel reeled in the full point, thus joining the leaders, Amin, Kryakvin, and Safarli.

    Four leaders in Open

    On this ‘matchless’ day, the two leaders in the Open, Dmitry Kryakvin and Bassem Amin, were joined by Eltaj Safarli and Dutch GM Erik van den Doel. Kryakvin and Amin themselves played an interesting draw, while Eltaj Safarli went all out against P Karthikeyan with a daring piece sacrifice. The Indian IM didn’t manage to stay afloat in the dazzling complications and lost. Van den Doel’s victory was a much calmer affair. He carefully dug a hole in Black’s position, on d6, jumped in it with a knight, allowing an exchange sacrifice which gave him a winning endgame.

    At the Drents Museum in Assen, the four match players had a lot of fun playing blitz while peddling on hometrainers, and visiting the exhibition Iran – the cradle of civilisation. Jorden van Foreest lost his short internet rapid match against Junior World Champion Parham Maghsoodloo ½-1½, but he did have his chances. According to tournament director Loek van Wely, who gave live commentary during the games, he should have won the first game and drawn the second. Of the second, in which he had sacrificed a pawn, Jorden himself wasn’t so sure: ‘I never saw a way to fully equalize.’

  • Vier leiders in Open na ronde 6

    Vier leiders in Open na ronde 6

    Day off for match players

    There will be no regular messages on this blog during the afternoon. We are off to the Drents Museum in Assen for a meet&greet with the four match players Jorden van Foreest, Vladimir Fedoseev, Sam Shankland and Peter Svidler, as well as a meet&greet with actress Christine Namaganda from the movie ‘Queen of Katwe’ and an online rapid between Jorden van Foreest and Youth World Champion Parham Maghsoodloo from Iran.

    We’ll be back at the end of the afternoon!

    Van Foreest vs Maghsoodloo on Chess24

    In the first online rapid game with Junior World Champion Parham Maghsoodloo, in the Statenzaal at the Drents Museum in Assen, Jorden van Foreest was pushing for a win with white in a knight ending, but the 18-year-old Iranian cleverly held the draw. The second rapid game is under way. Jorden has opted for a Ruy Lopez with 3…g6.

    Replay the full game here: https://chess24.com/en/game/W_VMWM52S0WRPH135af8ig

    Maghsoodloo wins!

    In the second game, Jorden van Foreest sacrificed a pawn with black and got good compensation for it, but went wrong, and lost a second pawn and the game, so a 0.5-1.5 loss for the Dutchman!

    Replay game 2 at https://chess24.com/en/game/3i78–ZjTV2LiYhEmYOVcQ

    Tense draw on top board

    Back in the Hoogeveen town hall! In round 6 of the Open, the top board game started with a King’s Indian that looked sharp and promising. Dmitry Kryakvin had an edge with white for a long time. ‘He was better prepared than I, it was a crazy position’, said Amin afterwards. But Kryakvin didn’t take too much risk and Bassem Amin managed to keep things under control: a tense draw.

    Bassem Amin

    Risky play Safarli pays off

    Eltaj Safarli won a completely crazy game today. He took some big risks in the opening, a kind of Reversed London System, ‘because that’s what you have to do when you want to win.’ He thought the Indian’s 8.b3 was too slow, and went for the sharpest way to get counterplay. Safarli sacrificed a piece to keep White’s king in the middle, and the following mind-boggling position came on the board:

    Karthikeyan-Safarli

    23…Rxe5

    Now White can oppose on e3 with the rook. Better was 23…Nxe5! 24.Bh3 Qd6 with complete control.

    24.Re3 Qe7 25.Rxe5

    He should probably have swapped while he had the chance: 25.Bxd4 cxd4 (25…Nxd4 26.Rxe5 Qxe5 27.Bd3) 26.Rxf3 Rxf3 27.Nxf3 Re3 28.c5! and Black’s compensation starts to dwindle. 25…Nxe5 26.Qe3 Qf6 27.Bd3

    Now after 27.Bxd4 cxd4 the queen has to return and it’s totally unclear again. But moves like 27.Bh3 or 27.b4 were better.

    27…f2 28.Rf1 h6

    29.Be4?!

    Good was 29.Bb1! to meet 29…Ng4?? with 30.Qe8+.

    29…Ng4 30.Bd5+ Kf8 31.Qg3 ?! Qe5 32.Bxd4 Qxd4

    Black is taking over now. Even stronger was 32…cxd4 as then after 33.Kc1, 33…Qe3! is devastating.

    33.Kc1 Ne3?

    33…Qe3! – the Azeri GM likes his queen too much, who has done such a great job for him in this game.

    34.Rxf2 Nxd5

    35.Re2?

    Finally losing. White could save himself with 35.Rxf4+ Nxf4 36.Qf3, when he wins back the pawn. Even 35.Rf3!!, keeping all options open, was an equalizer. Now Black keeps the extra pawn and the pressure. Seven moves later Karthikeyan resigned.

    Van den Doel also wins

    Erik van den Doel achieved an important victory against Evgeny Romanov. The strong Russian GM may have regretted castling queenside on move 14, as after that things started to go downhill for him. Van den Doel first swapped the dark-squared bishops and then planted a knight on d6, which was removed by an exchange sac. But it seems that Black never got enough compensation for the exchange, and late in the endgame Van den Doel reeled in the full point, thus joining the leaders, Amin, Kryakvin, and Safarli.

    Four leaders in Open

    On this ‘matchless’ day, the two leaders in the Open, Dmitry Kryakvin and Bassem Amin, were joined by Eltaj Safarli and Dutch GM Erik van den Doel. Kryakvin and Amin themselves played an interesting draw, while Eltaj Safarli went all out against P Karthikeyan with a daring piece sacrifice. The Indian IM didn’t manage to stay afloat in the dazzling complications and lost. Van den Doel’s victory was a much calmer affair. He carefully dug a hole in Black’s position, on d6, jumped in it with a knight, allowing an exchange sacrifice which gave him a winning endgame.

    At the Drents Museum in Assen, the four match players had a lot of fun playing blitz while peddling on hometrainers, and visiting the exhibition Iran – the cradle of civilisation. Jorden van Foreest lost his short internet rapid match against Junior World Champion Parham Maghsoodloo ½-1½, but he did have his chances. According to tournament director Loek van Wely, who gave live commentary during the games, he should have won the first game and drawn the second. Of the second, in which he had sacrificed a pawn, Jorden himself wasn’t so sure: ‘I never saw a way to fully equalize.’

  • Hoogeveen Chess Tournament visits Assen

    Hoogeveen Chess Tournament visits Assen

    After a warm welcome by general director Harry Tupan of the Drents Museum in Assen, three of the four match players, Peter Svidler, Sam Shankland, Jorden van Foreest, as well as tournament director Loek van Wely, took turns to play each other in blitz games while pedalling on home trainers. This is a popular occupation with chess grandmasters as it enables them to engage in ‘trash talk’ while making their moves. So it wasn’t easy to get them away from the chess bikes. In the meantime, Hans Böhm was playing blitz games with Ugandese actress Chirstine Namaganda (who plays the main protagonist Fiona’s opponent in the movie ‘Queen of Katwe’), and Vladimir Fedoseev was taking on all comers. He was surprisingly tricked by a veteran player from Assen, Tinus Spriensma, but got his revenge in the return game.

    After this, the match players, Christine Nagamanda, and Van Wely went downstairs for a photoshoot at the exhibition Iran – cradle of civilisation, which is running until 18 november. Tupan told us that this exhibition has attracted around 100,000 visitors so far, and the museum attracts in general 200,000 visitors every year, which is quite a feat for a city of less than 70,000 inhabitants!

    In the impressive ‘Statenzaal’, a laptop and a big screen had been installed, surrounded by wonderful tapestries depicting historical scenery, for the Internet rapid match between Jorden van Foreest and 18-year-old World Junior Champion Parham Maghsoodloo, who lives in Iran – the country of the exhibition in the Drents Museum. Jorden plays under the name Jorden, whereas Maghsoodloo uses the more imaginative grizzlybear79. Van Wely gave live comments, which were instructive and – more often!? – hilarious.

    In the first game, Jorden continued to show his good endgame skills (as we have seen in his match with Fedoseev). As White in a quiet Italian he doubled his opponent’s e-pawns and took charge in a four knights endgame. But it became tricky, and the Iranian GM cleverly saved the draw.

    Van Wely immediately received the message from Iran that Maghsoodloo ‘agreed that he had had a lucky escape’.

    In the second game, with black, Jorden played a specialty, the Ruy Lopez with 3…g6. Van Wely was a bit skeptic about the Dutchman’s provocative play. Soon the position was brimming with tactical tricks. Jorden lost a pawn, but had interesting compensation for it. While it looked as if White didn’t have a good plan, Van Foreest started wavering in approaching time-trouble, lost a second pawn, and had to resign in the end.

    It was a wonderful visit for the players to this beautiful museum in the capital of the province of Drenthe!

    Replay the games: Game 1 – Game 2

  • Hoogeveen Schaaktoernooi bezoekt Assen

    Hoogeveen Schaaktoernooi bezoekt Assen

    After a warm welcome by general director Harry Tupan of the Drents Museum in Assen, three of the four match players, Peter Svidler, Sam Shankland, Jorden van Foreest, as well as tournament director Loek van Wely, took turns to play each other in blitz games while pedalling on home trainers. This is a popular occupation with chess grandmasters as it enables them to engage in ‘trash talk’ while making their moves. So it wasn’t easy to get them away from the chess bikes. In the meantime, Hans Böhm was playing blitz games with Ugandese actress Chirstine Namaganda (who plays the main protagonist Fiona’s opponent in the movie ‘Queen of Katwe’), and Vladimir Fedoseev was taking on all comers. He was surprisingly tricked by a veteran player from Assen, Tinus Spriensma, but got his revenge in the return game.

    After this, the match players, Christine Nagamanda, and Van Wely went downstairs for a photoshoot at the exhibition Iran – cradle of civilisation, which is running until 18 november. Tupan told us that this exhibition has attracted around 100,000 visitors so far, and the museum attracts in general 200,000 visitors every year, which is quite a feat for a city of less than 70,000 inhabitants!

    In the impressive ‘Statenzaal’, a laptop and a big screen had been installed, surrounded by wonderful tapestries depicting historical scenery, for the Internet rapid match between Jorden van Foreest and 18-year-old World Junior Champion Parham Maghsoodloo, who lives in Iran – the country of the exhibition in the Drents Museum. Jorden plays under the name Jorden, whereas Maghsoodloo uses the more imaginative grizzlybear79. Van Wely gave live comments, which were instructive and – more often!? – hilarious.

    In the first game, Jorden continued to show his good endgame skills (as we have seen in his match with Fedoseev). As White in a quiet Italian he doubled his opponent’s e-pawns and took charge in a four knights endgame. But it became tricky, and the Iranian GM cleverly saved the draw.

    Van Wely immediately received the message from Iran that Maghsoodloo ‘agreed that he had had a lucky escape’.

    In the second game, with black, Jorden played a specialty, the Ruy Lopez with 3…g6. Van Wely was a bit skeptic about the Dutchman’s provocative play. Soon the position was brimming with tactical tricks. Jorden lost a pawn, but had interesting compensation for it. While it looked as if White didn’t have a good plan, Van Foreest started wavering in approaching time-trouble, lost a second pawn, and had to resign in the end.

    It was a wonderful visit for the players to this beautiful museum in the capital of the province of Drenthe!

    Replay the games: Game 1Game 2

    Find all photos here,