Categorie: Uncategorized

  • Amin en Kryakvin bereiken Finale

    Amin en Kryakvin bereiken Finale

    A nice ‘leftover’ from yesterday

    Here is a delayed message from yesterday’s round, about the game between Dutchman Maurice Schippers and 14-year-old Norwegian talent Jens Ingebretsen, who by the way is doing excellently so far with 4/7.

    Schippers – Ingebretsen

    Black played 51…Qg5+ here and the game ended in a draw.

    As Thomas Beerdsen pointed out, Black had an amazing win with 51…c1Q 52.d8Q Qcg5+ 53.Qxg5 hxg5+ 54.Kh5 Qe6!!

    55.Kxg5 e3! 56.fxe3. White has no useful queen moves! So Black wins with 56…Qg8+ or even 56…f2 first.

    Would you say Magnus would have spotted this at 14…?

     

     
    Some hiccups

    The 5th round of the matches has started, but there are technical problems with the live boards. Vladimir Fedoseev opened with 1.e4, Van Foreest replied 1…c5 and after 2.Nf3 d6 Fedoseev thought for a while before playing 3.d4. After 3…cxd4 4.Nxd4 Nf6 5.Nc3 a6 the Russian started to think again for several minutes. During those minutes Sam Shankland pointed out to the arbiters that the clock for his game wasn’t running, it turned out they hadn’t pushed the button hard enough. With chief arbiter Frans Peeters the time was ‘reconstructed’ (Peter Svidler took a walk because at one point, after Ne5 in the Fianchetto Grünfeld, he had thought for 2 minutes) and the game continued. Only after this did Fedoseev decide on 6.h3.

    Needless to say we’re doing everything we can to show you the games online games again!

    Semi-finals and 8th round Open

    Today the semi-finals of the Open started. Bassem Amin is playing Eltaj Safarli (a Scotch game) and Erik van den Doel confronted Dmitry Kryakvin with a London System.

    Unfortunately Roel Hamblok had to withdraw from the tournament, which means that his opponent, 13-year-old Rakshitta Ravi from Chennai, has no opponent today. It didn’t have any consequences for a possible WFM title, as she has already passed the 2200 border earlier this year. ‘But I didn’t apply for it’, the young Indian girl said. ‘I want to obtain the WIM title.’ She can do this tomorrow, in the last round of this event. Probably the only thing she needs for this is a titled opponent, and since she will have 5/8 after today this chance is quite large.

    Rakshitta Ravi in yesterday’s round, sitting beside the opponent she should have been playing today, Roel Hamblok

    Rakshitta has made WIM norms earlier this year in Cappelle-la-Grande (March) and in Pardubice (July). She will be playing more tournaments in Europe after this. ‘I have full-time leave from school and I make my exams in writing’, she explained.

    Sokolov: ‘Fedoseev-Van Foreest – a thematic match’

    Commentator GM Ivan Sokolov called the contest between Vladimir Fedoseev and Jorden van Foreest ‘a thematic match’.

    Commentator Ivan Sokolov

    Today the Russian opted for Fischer’s move 6.h3 against the Najdorf move 5…a6, which has a less good reputation in the Scheveningen. So, Jorden replied not 6…e6 but 6…g6, to turn it into a not-too-dangerous Dragon for Black. After 12.Nd5 the former Dutch champion allowed the damaging of his pawn structure by the capture on f6. Now Black’s only weakness is d6, but he does have active play on the half-open c- and e-files for it. Sokolov explained that if Black had taken on d5 himself, then after 13.exd5 Bxd4 14.Qxd4 Black does have the half-open c-file again, but it is White who has the e-file, with pressure on the e7-pawn, and eventually he can push his h-pawn to harass the lone black king.

    Fedoseev (left) vs Van Foreest

    Ivan had expected something sharper from Shankland, in view of his match situation, than the Fianchetto against Svidler’s Slav/Grünfeld set-up. 8…b6 is a move Magnus Carlsen has played, but it’s less well known than 8…e6 wih the idea …Nfd7, which was played 5 or 6 times by Kasparov against Karpov in their World Championship matches. Even though White played 7.Ne5 and later 13.Nf3, as well as 10.Qa4 and later 14.Qd1, he still had a small development advantage as Black could not well play …Nc6 due to e2-e4, with complications that often favour White. An interesting fight ‘under the surface’ for the centre.

    Shankland (left) vs Svidler

    Semi-finals update

    Bassem Amin has built up a good edge against Eltaj Safarli, mainly because of his pressure on the d5 isolani. Van den Doel’s London System has yielded him, quite characteristically for this line, somewhat freer play but Black seems to have no worries as he is very solid.

    Fedoseev-Van Foreest looks drawish

    In this game, Black’s weak d6-pawn has now been exchanged for White’s weak e4-pawn, and as a result the endgame looks pretty drawish. But we know for sure that Fedoseev (or perhaps both players?) will be trying some more.

    Stefan Kuipers fools himself

    Stefan Kuipers, the ‘Best of the Rest’ from the open last year, won’t be able to repeat that success himself. Today he tried to fool Indian IM P Karthikeyan, but instead got fooled himself.

    Kuipers-Karthikeyan

    Coming from the Tiger’s Modern Black is already doing quite well here, for example because 15.Qxd6?? is not possible as the queen is lost after 15…e5 and 16…Nc8. But Kuipers saw another tactical trick in the position:

    15.dxc5? dxc5 16.Bxc5? Nxc5 17.Bxb5+

    With queen plus 2 pawns for rook + 2 pieces, that was the idea. However when you calculate deeply, sometimes you overlook simple things…

    17…Ncd7 0-1

    Stefan Kuipers

    Some hidden possibilities in the Shankland-Svidler draw

    Today’s draw between Sam Shankland and Peter Svidler looked pretty placid, but under the surface horrible things had been going on.

    First, it seems that Shankland missed a very quick win:

    Shankland-Svidler

    Black’s last move, 13…Qe7, turns out to have been quite a mistake as some time after the game Shankland discovered 14.Nd1! with the threat of 15.Rc7, and after 14…b5 15.Qa5! is very strong, e.g. after 15…Nc6 16.Qc7 ‘Black can just resign’, Shankland sighed. ‘It seems that we’re not in the best shape.’

    Svidler: ‘Now, after 14.Qd1, indeed I cannot play 14…Nc6 because of 15.e4, so I wanted to play 14…Rc8 and …Nf6.

    14…Rc8

    15.Qd2

    After this move the position was just completely dead, according to both players. Svidler: ‘I was panicking here because I saw some crazy lines. For example, 15.e4 dxe4 16.Ng5 and here I had been planning 16…f5 but it turns out that 17.Ncxe4 is more or less winning.’ After 17…Rxc1 18.Rxc1 fxe4 19.Nxe4 Black has no good moves, e.g. 19…Nc6 20.Nd6 or 19… h6 20. Rc7 Bd5 21.Nc3 Bxg2 22.Kxg2 g5 23.Qf3.

    The players also talked about 17.Qb3 Re8 18.Bf1 but here Black is OK after 18…b5 or even better 18…Kh8.

    Instead of 16…f5, however, 16…Nc6 is playable, e.g. 17.Ncxe4 e5 ‘and I thought this was bad for me, but it seems to be OK’, Svidler concluded.

    Another, still crazier idea he had seen was 15.Nxd5!? exd5 16.Rxc8+ Bxc8 17.Rc1 Bb7 18.Rc7 Ra7 and Black is completely paralysed, but there is no immediate win in sight for White either. When the engine more or less confirmed his suspicions, Svidler said: ‘OK, I’m glad I’m apparently not a complete idiot.’

     

    Bassem Amin in the final!

    Bassem Amin has reached the final by outplaying Eltaj Safarli, who went wrong just after the opening.

    Amin-Safarli

    In this position, Safarli regretted having played 10…h6 (‘I should have gone 10…Re8’) after the reply 11.Be3 Bxe3 12.Qxe3,

    but here probably 12…d5 was too wild an attempt to free himself. 12…Re8 may still have been OK.

    After 13.0-0-0 Amin could press the isolani and eventually won, incidentally also passing the 2700 limit again.

    Bassem Amin (left) vs Eltaj Safarli

    The second semi-final

    The position in the game Erik van den Doel-Dmitry Kryakvin is equal but there is still some tension. The Dutch GM made his 40th move with 1.19 minute to go and then very coolly left the board to get a cup of coffee. He was apparently pretty sure he had indeed made 40 moves!

    Some Sokolov comments

    Ivan Sokolov was wondering why Vladimir Fedoseev kept playing on against Jorden van Foreest. ‘It wasn’t even necessary for Jorden to allow what is happening now, but it’s still a draw’, he said. About the Guseinov-Warmerdam draw he was also wondering: ‘Max had achieved just about everything Black wants in a Ruy Lopez’, our commentator said. ‘The only thing White had was 200 Elo points more. If he ever wants to beat these guys, now is the time. Or does he want to beat them from a bad position?’

    Max Warmerdam (left) during his game with teammate Thomas Beerdsen yesterday

    Buckels and Beerdsen lead, Pruijssers may join them

    German aspiring IM Valentin Buckels is leading after a good victory against P Iniyan, together with Thomas Beerdsen who beat his teammate Nico Zwirs after gaining a ‘small exchange’. Roeland Pruijssers is on his way to joining these two leaders. He was under pressure by Eelke de Boer for a while, but then the young player from Groningen slackened, and lost an exchange. He still had some compensation for a while, but things seem to be very much going Pruijssers’ way now.

    Valentin Buckels (17)

    Playoff Kryakvin and Van den Doel

    The second semi-final, between Erik van den Doel and Dmitry Kryakvin, ended in a draw. The playoff will take place in the Wedding Room of the town hall: Kryakvin starts with white, minimally 2 blitz games, 3 minutes each and 2 seconds added per move!

    Kryakvin reaches the final!

    After a nerve-wracking playoff Dmitry Kryakvin has reached the final, where he will be facing Bassem Amin with black. Erik van den Doel certainly had his chances though. After a difficult opening in Game 1, which took him quite some time,

    … the Dutchman came back in the game and even outplayed his Russian rival in the endgame. But when he had gained a pawn for which Kryakvin had to give his knight, a theoretical draw ensued in which Black’s extra bishop was not enough for the win.

    In game 2 a London System came on the board just like in the regular game between these two players today.

    Van den Doel had a little something with white, but again used up too much time and when he could only just defend his two bishops with his rook, his time had already run out.

    Kryakvin and his wife Elena Tomilova were over the moon. ‘So much money depending on one blitz game!’ Dmitry gasped.

    Another draw in the FF match

    The draw between Vladimir Fedoseev and Jorden van Foreest today was a pretty bloodless affair. ‘I should have played 9.a4 instead of 9.0-0 to prevent his counterplay with …b7-b5’, Fedoseev said. ‘His 12…Bb7 in reply to my 12.Nd5 was good, he just gets immediate pressure on my e4-pawn. After that it was just probably 0.00 all the time.’

    Tomorrow Jorden can take a last shot at winning this tough match, in his final White game.

    Vladimir Fedoseev (left) and a small piece of Jorden van Foreest

    Svidler still leading, Amin and Kryakvin play final

    Today the excitement mainly came from the very tense blitz playoff between Dmitry Kryakvin and Erik van den Doel. In the end the Russian won 1½-½ and so qualified for the final against Bassem Amin, who beat Eltaj Safarli earlier today.

    There was not a lot of excitement in the 6.h3 Sicilian of Vladimir Fedoseev and Jorden Fedoseev, where the Dutchman equalized pretty easily with black with a few to-the-point moves. Then Fedoseev tried for a long time to squeeze water out of a stone, but he didn’t manage: the score in this match is 2½-2½ going into the last round.

    The game Shankland-Svidler also became a quite placid affair after White’s 15th move, but one move earlier the American had missed an enormous chance, as he discovered later. Svidler had seen a few wild and crazy lines, but alas none of those came on the board: also a draw, and a 3-2 lead for Svidler.

  • Report round 7 Open and round 4 Matches

    Report round 7 Open and round 4 Matches

    Day 6 has started!

    Round 7 of the Open and round 4 of the matches have just started.

    This time Peter Svidler opted for 1.Nf3 as the first move, and continued after 1…d5 with the currently quite popular and ‘poisonous’ 2.e3.

    In the other match, again the Najdorf came on the board. Unlike the 2nd game, where he played 7.f4 after 6.Be2 e6, Jorden van Foreest has now played 7.Be3.

     

     

    Two short draws in Open

    Today is an important day in the Open. After round 7, the first 4 players will qualify for the semifinals, which will be played tomorrow.

    We already have a few very quick draws: between Frenchman Hector Giacomini and Luuk van Kooten, and between Jonas Hilwerda and Peter Hulshof. At the moment there are some technical problems with boards 35-39. We will provide the game scores as soon as possible.

    Jonas Hilwerda

    No short draws after all!

    Hector Giacomini and Luuk van Kooten as well as Jonas Hilwerda and Peter Hulshof are still playing! The 2 draws I wrote about were also a technical glitch.

    Sokolov: ‘Black is OK – twice’

    Today’s commentator Ivan Sokolov gave a very instructive analysis of the openings in both matches. He argued that in the Scheveningen Sicilian that came on the board in Van Foreest-Fedoseev, Black’s play may be even easier than White’s since he has a clear plan: …Rac8, …Rae8 and …d6-d5.

    In Svidler-Shankland, White kept his d-pawn on d2 for a while because he may want a set-up with b2-b3, Bb2 and g2-g4, as was for example played in the recent important Olympiad game Nepomniachtchi-Bacrot (1-0). Shankland prevented this with 4…dxc4, opting for a Queen’s Gambit Accepted set-up where White’s knight is not great on c3. After …b7-b5 White wants to play a2-a4, but in this case after …b5-b4 the knight has to go back to b1 and he loses several tempi. When Svidler played 8.d4 after all, Black had no problems. With the later 11.e4 White aims for e4-e5, but the American’s reaction 11…cxd4 and 12…Bd6 was again spot on. Sokolov: ‘With the rook on d1 White now cannot play f2-f4 and has to do something against the threat on h2.

    Great stuff!

    They’re going for it!

    In the Open, some experts expected a short draw on top board because both Bassem Amin and Erik van den Doel have the best TPR and have good chances of qualifying for the semi-finals. But they seem to be going for it, although in a quite careful way.

     

    IM David Miedema suddenly seems to have a strong attack against Tijana Blagojevic. In the following position the Serbian WIM opened the floodgates:

    17…e5?

    Now White can give a deadly check with 18.Bd5+ and then attack Black’s f5 weakness with 19.g4 – the computer even suggests 18.g4 immediately.

    Tijana Blagojevic

     

    A feint by Van Foreest?

    There are already lots of interesting tactics possible in the game Van Foreest-Fedoseev.

    Tournament director Loek van Wely suggested the option of 13.Ndxb5 axb5 14.Nxb5 Qb8 15.Nxd6+ Kf8 here, with three pawns for the knight.

    After 13…O-O 14.Bg5 Rfc8 15.Bd3 Rab8, here, instead, Van Foreest started an attack on the black king in gung-ho style with 16.Rh3 Ba8 17.Rg3 Ne5 18.Bh6 Ne8

    and now thought for a while.

    Would Jorden sac on g7? No! He has retreated his bishop.

     

    Draw on board 1 Open

    Well, of course it often happens that we write something on the blog which is refuted soon after. Bassem Amin and Erik van den Doel have made a fairly quick draw, and now the others can try to play catch-up.

    A mistake by Shankland?

    When Peter Svidler has a red face, walks around at a furious pace and sits with his head in his hands at the board, things seem to look terrible for him. But in the 8-fold Russian champion’s case this usually means he is winning! He has invaded Black’s weakened kingside with his queen. It looks extremely dangerous for Shankland. On move 19 he could have kept everything covered with 19…Be7 instead of the sharp 19…hxg3!?. Now the g-file has also been opened, and Sokolov ventured in the commentary room that Black won’t survive this for long.

    Peter Svidler

    Safarli and Kryakvin also draw

    Board 2 of the Open has also ended in a fairly quick draw. Nothing special, Dmitry Kryakvin whispered in the playing room.

    Eltaj Safarli (left) and Dmitry Kryakvin

    Apeldoorn teammates Max Warmerdam and Thomas Beerdsen have also already signed the peace treaty.

     

     

     

    Van Foreest loses a piece

    Jorden van Foreest may be regretting that he put his bishop on g5 instead of sacrificing it on g7. Now the bishop is closed in anyway and he has put it on h6, hoping to draw compensation from Black’s shattered kingside.

    Jorden van Foreest… his hand close to the piteous c1-bishop

    Svidler analyses his win

    Peter Svidler just won a brilliant game, and he went to the commentary room to explain what happened.

    Svidler-Shankland

    19…hxg3?!

    Svidler: ‘Here he has the clever move 19… Be7! to bail out: after 20.Bxh4 he has 20…e5. Then I can consider 21.Nf5 Bc5+ (21… Rxd2 22. Nxe7+ Kh7 23. Rxd2 Qa7+ 24. Kg2 Qe3

    followed by taking on e4 looks even better for Black, PB) 22. Rxc5 Rxd2 23. Rxd2 Qa7 and my rook is caught.’

    20.Bxf6 gxf6 21.Qh6

    ‘If I can get this I just have to go for it.’

    21…Be5 22.Kh1! g2+

    Svidler wasn’t sure about 22… f5 23.Rg1 Bg7 24.Qh5 and now 24…fxe4, but after 25.Rxg3 exf3 26.Rxg7+! Black just gets mated.

    23.Kxg2 Bxd4 24.Nxd4 Qe5

    25.Kh1

    Svidler: ‘I calculated 25.Nf5 exf5 26.Kh1 Rxd1+ 27.Rxd1 Nh7 28.Bxf7+ and White wins, but I panicked when I saw the immediate

    26…Nh7. Of course 27.Bxf7+ also wins here, e.g. 27…Kxf7 28.Qxh7+ Ke6 29.exf5+

    25…Bxe4

    ‘This move I had completely overlooked, but luckily it didn’t cost me anything; White is still winning.’

    26.Rg1+ Bg6 27.Nxe6!

    27…fxe6

    ‘Here there is a fantastic variation: 27…Nxe6 28.Rce1 Qf5 29.Bxe6 Qxf3+ 30.Rg2 Qe4 31.Rxe4 Rd1+ 32.Rg1 and now I am again in luck as the mating move 32…Be4 is not legal!’

    28.Rxg6+

    There are many wins here, including the flashy 28.Rc7, but now Black just gets mated.

    28…Nxg6 29.Qxg6+ Kf8 30.Qh6+ Ke7 31.Qh7+

    And Black resigned because of 32.Rg1.

    Bravo!

    Van Foreest – Fedoseev seems a dead draw

    Van Foreest got enough compensation after his bishop was closed in, but on move 26 Fedoseev may have played not the best move.

    If, instead of taking on e4, he played 26…a5! Black could continue his kingside attack and would have been clearly better. After 26…Bxe4 Van Foreest had a relatively easy task of winning a couple of pawns and exchanging queens, leading to a drawn endgame.

    Fourth draw for Van Foreest and Fedoseev

    Also in the fourth match game Jorden van Foreest managed to draw after some hard work. Vladimir Fedoseev admitted that after 26…Bxe4 27.Nxe4 Qxe4 he had missed 28.f5!, which gives Black good compensation. Next, after 32.Qd5+ he thought he might have tried 32…Kh7 when Black is more active than in the game.

    The players agreed that the sac 19.Bxg7 Nxg7 20.Qh6 Bf8 21.f4 would have been a better chance. ‘This is complicated, and looks quite interesting’, said Fedoseev. Van Foreest thought that after the move 26…a5! that we mentioned in the previous blog it would have been ‘game over’.

     

    Amin, Van den Doel, Safarli and Kryakvin go to semi-finals

    The games on all six top boards ended in draws, which means that the two top boards, Bassem Amin, Erik van den Doel, Eltaj Safarli and Dmitry Kryakvin go on to the semi-finals which will start tomorrow.

    The most tense game was the one between P Shyaamnikhil and Gadir Guseinov. ‘I was worde after the opening’, the Indian IM said, ’then it became complicated, but I managed to equalize.’ A win might have put him into contention for the semi-finals, ‘but I think I would have stayed in the regular tournament’, Shyaamnikhil said, ‘as I want to fight for a GM norm. This wouldn’t have been possible in the semi-finals since I have played Bassem Amin already earlier in the tournament.’

    Indian IM P Shyaamnikhil

    Svidler takes the lead

    Peter Svidler took the lead in his match with Sam Shankland today with a brilliant win. In the commentary room he was beaming and showed the audience and commentator Ivan Sokolov a number of brilliant variations. ‘But still I missed something also in this game’, said the super-GM. Jorden van Foreest again had to pull out all the stops to achieve a draw against Vladimir Fedoseev, but when the other Russian super-GM missed something on move 26 the Dutchman again managed to escape by a hair’s breadth.

    In the Open, things were pretty quiet today at the top boards. Six draws were registered, which meant that the standings at the top of the list remained unchanged and Bassem Amin, Erik van den Doel, Eltaj Safarli and Dmitry Kryakvin qualified for what promises to be an exciting semi-final and final in the coming days.

     

     

     

  • Verslag Ronde 7 Open en Ronde 4 Matches

    Verslag Ronde 7 Open en Ronde 4 Matches

    Day 6 has started!

    Round 7 of the Open and round 4 of the matches have just started.

    This time Peter Svidler opted for 1.Nf3 as the first move, and continued after 1…d5 with the currently quite popular and ‘poisonous’ 2.e3.

    In the other match, again the Najdorf came on the board. Unlike the 2nd game, where he played 7.f4 after 6.Be2 e6, Jorden van Foreest has now played 7.Be3.

     

     

    Two short draws in Open

    Today is an important day in the Open. After round 7, the first 4 players will qualify for the semifinals, which will be played tomorrow.

    We already have a few very quick draws: between Frenchman Hector Giacomini and Luuk van Kooten, and between Jonas Hilwerda and Peter Hulshof. At the moment there are some technical problems with boards 35-39. We will provide the game scores as soon as possible.

    Jonas Hilwerda

    No short draws after all!

    Hector Giacomini and Luuk van Kooten as well as Jonas Hilwerda and Peter Hulshof are still playing! The 2 draws I wrote about were also a technical glitch.

    Sokolov: ‘Black is OK – twice’

    Today’s commentator Ivan Sokolov gave a very instructive analysis of the openings in both matches. He argued that in the Scheveningen Sicilian that came on the board in Van Foreest-Fedoseev, Black’s play may be even easier than White’s since he has a clear plan: …Rac8, …Rae8 and …d6-d5.

    In Svidler-Shankland, White kept his d-pawn on d2 for a while because he may want a set-up with b2-b3, Bb2 and g2-g4, as was for example played in the recent important Olympiad game Nepomniachtchi-Bacrot (1-0). Shankland prevented this with 4…dxc4, opting for a Queen’s Gambit Accepted set-up where White’s knight is not great on c3. After …b7-b5 White wants to play a2-a4, but in this case after …b5-b4 the knight has to go back to b1 and he loses several tempi. When Svidler played 8.d4 after all, Black had no problems. With the later 11.e4 White aims for e4-e5, but the American’s reaction 11…cxd4 and 12…Bd6 was again spot on. Sokolov: ‘With the rook on d1 White now cannot play f2-f4 and has to do something against the threat on h2.

    Great stuff!

    They’re going for it!

    In the Open, some experts expected a short draw on top board because both Bassem Amin and Erik van den Doel have the best TPR and have good chances of qualifying for the semi-finals. But they seem to be going for it, although in a quite careful way.

     

    IM David Miedema suddenly seems to have a strong attack against Tijana Blagojevic. In the following position the Serbian WIM opened the floodgates:

    17…e5?

    Now White can give a deadly check with 18.Bd5+ and then attack Black’s f5 weakness with 19.g4 – the computer even suggests 18.g4 immediately.

    Tijana Blagojevic

     

    A feint by Van Foreest?

    There are already lots of interesting tactics possible in the game Van Foreest-Fedoseev.

    Tournament director Loek van Wely suggested the option of 13.Ndxb5 axb5 14.Nxb5 Qb8 15.Nxd6+ Kf8 here, with three pawns for the knight.

    After 13…O-O 14.Bg5 Rfc8 15.Bd3 Rab8, here, instead, Van Foreest started an attack on the black king in gung-ho style with 16.Rh3 Ba8 17.Rg3 Ne5 18.Bh6 Ne8

    and now thought for a while.

    Would Jorden sac on g7? No! He has retreated his bishop.

     

    Draw on board 1 Open

    Well, of course it often happens that we write something on the blog which is refuted soon after. Bassem Amin and Erik van den Doel have made a fairly quick draw, and now the others can try to play catch-up.

    A mistake by Shankland?

    When Peter Svidler has a red face, walks around at a furious pace and sits with his head in his hands at the board, things seem to look terrible for him. But in the 8-fold Russian champion’s case this usually means he is winning! He has invaded Black’s weakened kingside with his queen. It looks extremely dangerous for Shankland. On move 19 he could have kept everything covered with 19…Be7 instead of the sharp 19…hxg3!?. Now the g-file has also been opened, and Sokolov ventured in the commentary room that Black won’t survive this for long.

    Peter Svidler

    Safarli and Kryakvin also draw

    Board 2 of the Open has also ended in a fairly quick draw. Nothing special, Dmitry Kryakvin whispered in the playing room.

    Eltaj Safarli (left) and Dmitry Kryakvin

    Apeldoorn teammates Max Warmerdam and Thomas Beerdsen have also already signed the peace treaty.

     

     

     

    Van Foreest loses a piece

    Jorden van Foreest may be regretting that he put his bishop on g5 instead of sacrificing it on g7. Now the bishop is closed in anyway and he has put it on h6, hoping to draw compensation from Black’s shattered kingside.

    Jorden van Foreest… his hand close to the piteous c1-bishop

    Svidler analyses his win

    Peter Svidler just won a brilliant game, and he went to the commentary room to explain what happened.

    Svidler-Shankland

    19…hxg3?!

    Svidler: ‘Here he has the clever move 19… Be7! to bail out: after 20.Bxh4 he has 20…e5. Then I can consider 21.Nf5 Bc5+ (21… Rxd2 22. Nxe7+ Kh7 23. Rxd2 Qa7+ 24. Kg2 Qe3

    followed by taking on e4 looks even better for Black, PB) 22. Rxc5 Rxd2 23. Rxd2 Qa7 and my rook is caught.’

    20.Bxf6 gxf6 21.Qh6

    ‘If I can get this I just have to go for it.’

    21…Be5 22.Kh1! g2+

    Svidler wasn’t sure about 22… f5 23.Rg1 Bg7 24.Qh5 and now 24…fxe4, but after 25.Rxg3 exf3 26.Rxg7+! Black just gets mated.

    23.Kxg2 Bxd4 24.Nxd4 Qe5

    25.Kh1

    Svidler: ‘I calculated 25.Nf5 exf5 26.Kh1 Rxd1+ 27.Rxd1 Nh7 28.Bxf7+ and White wins, but I panicked when I saw the immediate

    26…Nh7. Of course 27.Bxf7+ also wins here, e.g. 27…Kxf7 28.Qxh7+ Ke6 29.exf5+

    25…Bxe4

    ‘This move I had completely overlooked, but luckily it didn’t cost me anything; White is still winning.’

    26.Rg1+ Bg6 27.Nxe6!

    27…fxe6

    ‘Here there is a fantastic variation: 27…Nxe6 28.Rce1 Qf5 29.Bxe6 Qxf3+ 30.Rg2 Qe4 31.Rxe4 Rd1+ 32.Rg1 and now I am again in luck as the mating move 32…Be4 is not legal!’

    28.Rxg6+

    There are many wins here, including the flashy 28.Rc7, but now Black just gets mated.

    28…Nxg6 29.Qxg6+ Kf8 30.Qh6+ Ke7 31.Qh7+

    And Black resigned because of 32.Rg1.

    Bravo!

    Van Foreest – Fedoseev seems a dead draw

    Van Foreest got enough compensation after his bishop was closed in, but on move 26 Fedoseev may have played not the best move.

    If, instead of taking on e4, he played 26…a5! Black could continue his kingside attack and would have been clearly better. After 26…Bxe4 Van Foreest had a relatively easy task of winning a couple of pawns and exchanging queens, leading to a drawn endgame.

    Fourth draw for Van Foreest and Fedoseev

    Also in the fourth match game Jorden van Foreest managed to draw after some hard work. Vladimir Fedoseev admitted that after 26…Bxe4 27.Nxe4 Qxe4 he had missed 28.f5!, which gives Black good compensation. Next, after 32.Qd5+ he thought he might have tried 32…Kh7 when Black is more active than in the game.

    The players agreed that the sac 19.Bxg7 Nxg7 20.Qh6 Bf8 21.f4 would have been a better chance. ‘This is complicated, and looks quite interesting’, said Fedoseev. Van Foreest thought that after the move 26…a5! that we mentioned in the previous blog it would have been ‘game over’.

     

    Amin, Van den Doel, Safarli and Kryakvin go to semi-finals

    The games on all six top boards ended in draws, which means that the two top boards, Bassem Amin, Erik van den Doel, Eltaj Safarli and Dmitry Kryakvin go on to the semi-finals which will start tomorrow.

    The most tense game was the one between P Shyaamnikhil and Gadir Guseinov. ‘I was worde after the opening’, the Indian IM said, ’then it became complicated, but I managed to equalize.’ A win might have put him into contention for the semi-finals, ‘but I think I would have stayed in the regular tournament’, Shyaamnikhil said, ‘as I want to fight for a GM norm. This wouldn’t have been possible in the semi-finals since I have played Bassem Amin already earlier in the tournament.’

    Indian IM P Shyaamnikhil

    Svidler takes the lead

    Peter Svidler took the lead in his match with Sam Shankland today with a brilliant win. In the commentary room he was beaming and showed the audience and commentator Ivan Sokolov a number of brilliant variations. ‘But still I missed something also in this game’, said the super-GM. Jorden van Foreest again had to pull out all the stops to achieve a draw against Vladimir Fedoseev, but when the other Russian super-GM missed something on move 26 the Dutchman again managed to escape by a hair’s breadth.

    In the Open, things were pretty quiet today at the top boards. Six draws were registered, which meant that the standings at the top of the list remained unchanged and Bassem Amin, Erik van den Doel, Eltaj Safarli and Dmitry Kryakvin qualified for what promises to be an exciting semi-final and final in the coming days.

     

     

     

  • Four leaders in Open after round 6

    Four leaders in Open after round 6

     

    Day off for match players

    There will be no regular messages on this blog during the afternoon. We are off to the Drents Museum in Assen for a meet&greet with the four match players Jorden van Foreest, Vladimir Fedoseev, Sam Shankland and Peter Svidler, as well as a meet&greet with actress Christine Namaganda from the movie ‘Queen of Katwe’ and an online rapid between Jorden van Foreest and Youth World Champion Parham Maghsoodloo from Iran.

    We’ll be back at the end of the afternoon!

     

     
     

    Van Foreest vs Maghsoodloo on Chess24

    In the first online rapid game with Junior World Champion Parham Maghsoodloo, in the Statenzaal at the Drents Museum in Assen, Jorden van Foreest was pushing for a win with white in a knight ending, but the 18-year-old Iranian cleverly held the draw. The second rapid game is under way. Jorden has opted for a Ruy Lopez with 3…g6.

     

    Replay the full game here: https://chess24.com/en/game/W_VMWM52S0WRPH135af8ig

    Maghsoodloo wins!

    In the second game, Jorden van Foreest sacrificed a pawn with black and got good compensation for it, but went wrong, and lost a second pawn and the game, so a 0.5-1.5 loss for the Dutchman!

     

    Replay game 2 at https://chess24.com/en/game/3i78–ZjTV2LiYhEmYOVcQ

    Tense draw on top board

    Back in the Hoogeveen town hall! In round 6 of the Open, the top board game started with a King’s Indian that looked sharp and promising. Dmitry Kryakvin had an edge with white for a long time. ‘He was better prepared than I, it was a crazy position’, said Amin afterwards. But Kryakvin didn’t take too much risk and Bassem Amin managed to keep things under control: a tense draw.

    Bassem Amin

    Risky play Safarli pays off

    Eltaj Safarli won a completely crazy game today. He took some big risks in the opening, a kind of Reversed London System, ‘because that’s what you have to do when you want to win.’ He thought the Indian’s 8.b3 was too slow, and went for the sharpest way to get counterplay. Safarli sacrificed a piece to keep White’s king in the middle, and the following mind-boggling position came on the board:

    Karthikeyan-Safarli

    23…Rxe5

    Now White can oppose on e3 with the rook. Better was 23…Nxe5! 24.Bh3 Qd6 with complete control.

    24.Re3 Qe7 25.Rxe5

    He should probably have swapped while he had the chance: 25.Bxd4 cxd4 (25…Nxd4 26.Rxe5 Qxe5 27.Bd3) 26.Rxf3 Rxf3 27.Nxf3 Re3 28.c5! and Black’s compensation starts to dwindle. 25…Nxe5 26.Qe3 Qf6 27.Bd3

    Now after 27.Bxd4 cxd4 the queen has to return and it’s totally unclear again. But moves like 27.Bh3 or 27.b4 were better.

    27…f2 28.Rf1 h6

    29.Be4?!

    Good was 29.Bb1! to meet 29…Ng4?? with 30.Qe8+.

    29…Ng4 30.Bd5+ Kf8 31.Qg3 ?! Qe5 32.Bxd4 Qxd4

    Black is taking over now. Even stronger was 32…cxd4 as then after 33.Kc1, 33…Qe3! is devastating.

    33.Kc1 Ne3?

    33…Qe3! – the Azeri GM likes his queen too much, who has done such a great job for him in this game.

    34.Rxf2 Nxd5

    35.Re2?

    Finally losing. White could save himself with 35.Rxf4+ Nxf4 36.Qf3, when he wins back the pawn. Even 35.Rf3!!, keeping all options open, was an equalizer. Now Black keeps the extra pawn and the pressure. Seven moves later Karthikeyan resigned.

     

    Van den Doel also wins

    Erik van den Doel achieved an important victory against Evgeny Romanov. The strong Russian GM may have regretted castling queenside on move 14, as after that things started to go downhill for him. Van den Doel first swapped the dark-squared bishops and then planted a knight on d6, which was removed by an exchange sac. But it seems that Black never got enough compensation for the exchange, and late in the endgame Van den Doel reeled in the full point, thus joining the leaders, Amin, Kryakvin, and Safarli.

    Four leaders in Open

    On this ‘matchless’ day, the two leaders in the Open, Dmitry Kryakvin and Bassem Amin, were joined by Eltaj Safarli and Dutch GM Erik van den Doel. Kryakvin and Amin themselves played an interesting draw, while Eltaj Safarli went all out against P Karthikeyan with a daring piece sacrifice. The Indian IM didn’t manage to stay afloat in the dazzling complications and lost. Van den Doel’s victory was a much calmer affair. He carefully dug a hole in Black’s position, on d6, jumped in it with a knight, allowing an exchange sacrifice which gave him a winning endgame.

    At the Drents Museum in Assen, the four match players had a lot of fun playing blitz while peddling on hometrainers, and visiting the exhibition Iran – the cradle of civilisation. Jorden van Foreest lost his short internet rapid match against Junior World Champion Parham Maghsoodloo ½-1½, but he did have his chances. According to tournament director Loek van Wely, who gave live commentary during the games, he should have won the first game and drawn the second. Of the second, in which he had sacrificed a pawn, Jorden himself wasn’t so sure: ‘I never saw a way to fully equalize.’

  • Vier leiders in Open na ronde 6

    Vier leiders in Open na ronde 6

    Day off for match players

    There will be no regular messages on this blog during the afternoon. We are off to the Drents Museum in Assen for a meet&greet with the four match players Jorden van Foreest, Vladimir Fedoseev, Sam Shankland and Peter Svidler, as well as a meet&greet with actress Christine Namaganda from the movie ‘Queen of Katwe’ and an online rapid between Jorden van Foreest and Youth World Champion Parham Maghsoodloo from Iran.

    We’ll be back at the end of the afternoon!

    Van Foreest vs Maghsoodloo on Chess24

    In the first online rapid game with Junior World Champion Parham Maghsoodloo, in the Statenzaal at the Drents Museum in Assen, Jorden van Foreest was pushing for a win with white in a knight ending, but the 18-year-old Iranian cleverly held the draw. The second rapid game is under way. Jorden has opted for a Ruy Lopez with 3…g6.

    Replay the full game here: https://chess24.com/en/game/W_VMWM52S0WRPH135af8ig

    Maghsoodloo wins!

    In the second game, Jorden van Foreest sacrificed a pawn with black and got good compensation for it, but went wrong, and lost a second pawn and the game, so a 0.5-1.5 loss for the Dutchman!

    Replay game 2 at https://chess24.com/en/game/3i78–ZjTV2LiYhEmYOVcQ

    Tense draw on top board

    Back in the Hoogeveen town hall! In round 6 of the Open, the top board game started with a King’s Indian that looked sharp and promising. Dmitry Kryakvin had an edge with white for a long time. ‘He was better prepared than I, it was a crazy position’, said Amin afterwards. But Kryakvin didn’t take too much risk and Bassem Amin managed to keep things under control: a tense draw.

    Bassem Amin

    Risky play Safarli pays off

    Eltaj Safarli won a completely crazy game today. He took some big risks in the opening, a kind of Reversed London System, ‘because that’s what you have to do when you want to win.’ He thought the Indian’s 8.b3 was too slow, and went for the sharpest way to get counterplay. Safarli sacrificed a piece to keep White’s king in the middle, and the following mind-boggling position came on the board:

    Karthikeyan-Safarli

    23…Rxe5

    Now White can oppose on e3 with the rook. Better was 23…Nxe5! 24.Bh3 Qd6 with complete control.

    24.Re3 Qe7 25.Rxe5

    He should probably have swapped while he had the chance: 25.Bxd4 cxd4 (25…Nxd4 26.Rxe5 Qxe5 27.Bd3) 26.Rxf3 Rxf3 27.Nxf3 Re3 28.c5! and Black’s compensation starts to dwindle. 25…Nxe5 26.Qe3 Qf6 27.Bd3

    Now after 27.Bxd4 cxd4 the queen has to return and it’s totally unclear again. But moves like 27.Bh3 or 27.b4 were better.

    27…f2 28.Rf1 h6

    29.Be4?!

    Good was 29.Bb1! to meet 29…Ng4?? with 30.Qe8+.

    29…Ng4 30.Bd5+ Kf8 31.Qg3 ?! Qe5 32.Bxd4 Qxd4

    Black is taking over now. Even stronger was 32…cxd4 as then after 33.Kc1, 33…Qe3! is devastating.

    33.Kc1 Ne3?

    33…Qe3! – the Azeri GM likes his queen too much, who has done such a great job for him in this game.

    34.Rxf2 Nxd5

    35.Re2?

    Finally losing. White could save himself with 35.Rxf4+ Nxf4 36.Qf3, when he wins back the pawn. Even 35.Rf3!!, keeping all options open, was an equalizer. Now Black keeps the extra pawn and the pressure. Seven moves later Karthikeyan resigned.

    Van den Doel also wins

    Erik van den Doel achieved an important victory against Evgeny Romanov. The strong Russian GM may have regretted castling queenside on move 14, as after that things started to go downhill for him. Van den Doel first swapped the dark-squared bishops and then planted a knight on d6, which was removed by an exchange sac. But it seems that Black never got enough compensation for the exchange, and late in the endgame Van den Doel reeled in the full point, thus joining the leaders, Amin, Kryakvin, and Safarli.

    Four leaders in Open

    On this ‘matchless’ day, the two leaders in the Open, Dmitry Kryakvin and Bassem Amin, were joined by Eltaj Safarli and Dutch GM Erik van den Doel. Kryakvin and Amin themselves played an interesting draw, while Eltaj Safarli went all out against P Karthikeyan with a daring piece sacrifice. The Indian IM didn’t manage to stay afloat in the dazzling complications and lost. Van den Doel’s victory was a much calmer affair. He carefully dug a hole in Black’s position, on d6, jumped in it with a knight, allowing an exchange sacrifice which gave him a winning endgame.

    At the Drents Museum in Assen, the four match players had a lot of fun playing blitz while peddling on hometrainers, and visiting the exhibition Iran – the cradle of civilisation. Jorden van Foreest lost his short internet rapid match against Junior World Champion Parham Maghsoodloo ½-1½, but he did have his chances. According to tournament director Loek van Wely, who gave live commentary during the games, he should have won the first game and drawn the second. Of the second, in which he had sacrificed a pawn, Jorden himself wasn’t so sure: ‘I never saw a way to fully equalize.’

  • Hoogeveen Chess Tournament visits Assen

    Hoogeveen Chess Tournament visits Assen

    After a warm welcome by general director Harry Tupan of the Drents Museum in Assen, three of the four match players, Peter Svidler, Sam Shankland, Jorden van Foreest, as well as tournament director Loek van Wely, took turns to play each other in blitz games while pedalling on home trainers. This is a popular occupation with chess grandmasters as it enables them to engage in ‘trash talk’ while making their moves. So it wasn’t easy to get them away from the chess bikes. In the meantime, Hans Böhm was playing blitz games with Ugandese actress Chirstine Namaganda (who plays the main protagonist Fiona’s opponent in the movie ‘Queen of Katwe’), and Vladimir Fedoseev was taking on all comers. He was surprisingly tricked by a veteran player from Assen, Tinus Spriensma, but got his revenge in the return game.

    After this, the match players, Christine Nagamanda, and Van Wely went downstairs for a photoshoot at the exhibition Iran – cradle of civilisation, which is running until 18 november. Tupan told us that this exhibition has attracted around 100,000 visitors so far, and the museum attracts in general 200,000 visitors every year, which is quite a feat for a city of less than 70,000 inhabitants!

    In the impressive ‘Statenzaal’, a laptop and a big screen had been installed, surrounded by wonderful tapestries depicting historical scenery, for the Internet rapid match between Jorden van Foreest and 18-year-old World Junior Champion Parham Maghsoodloo, who lives in Iran – the country of the exhibition in the Drents Museum. Jorden plays under the name Jorden, whereas Maghsoodloo uses the more imaginative grizzlybear79. Van Wely gave live comments, which were instructive and – more often!? – hilarious.

    In the first game, Jorden continued to show his good endgame skills (as we have seen in his match with Fedoseev). As White in a quiet Italian he doubled his opponent’s e-pawns and took charge in a four knights endgame. But it became tricky, and the Iranian GM cleverly saved the draw.

    Van Wely immediately received the message from Iran that Maghsoodloo ‘agreed that he had had a lucky escape’.

    In the second game, with black, Jorden played a specialty, the Ruy Lopez with 3…g6. Van Wely was a bit skeptic about the Dutchman’s provocative play. Soon the position was brimming with tactical tricks. Jorden lost a pawn, but had interesting compensation for it. While it looked as if White didn’t have a good plan, Van Foreest started wavering in approaching time-trouble, lost a second pawn, and had to resign in the end.

    It was a wonderful visit for the players to this beautiful museum in the capital of the province of Drenthe!

    Replay the games: Game 1 – Game 2

  • Hoogeveen Schaaktoernooi bezoekt Assen

    Hoogeveen Schaaktoernooi bezoekt Assen

    After a warm welcome by general director Harry Tupan of the Drents Museum in Assen, three of the four match players, Peter Svidler, Sam Shankland, Jorden van Foreest, as well as tournament director Loek van Wely, took turns to play each other in blitz games while pedalling on home trainers. This is a popular occupation with chess grandmasters as it enables them to engage in ‘trash talk’ while making their moves. So it wasn’t easy to get them away from the chess bikes. In the meantime, Hans Böhm was playing blitz games with Ugandese actress Chirstine Namaganda (who plays the main protagonist Fiona’s opponent in the movie ‘Queen of Katwe’), and Vladimir Fedoseev was taking on all comers. He was surprisingly tricked by a veteran player from Assen, Tinus Spriensma, but got his revenge in the return game.

    After this, the match players, Christine Nagamanda, and Van Wely went downstairs for a photoshoot at the exhibition Iran – cradle of civilisation, which is running until 18 november. Tupan told us that this exhibition has attracted around 100,000 visitors so far, and the museum attracts in general 200,000 visitors every year, which is quite a feat for a city of less than 70,000 inhabitants!

    In the impressive ‘Statenzaal’, a laptop and a big screen had been installed, surrounded by wonderful tapestries depicting historical scenery, for the Internet rapid match between Jorden van Foreest and 18-year-old World Junior Champion Parham Maghsoodloo, who lives in Iran – the country of the exhibition in the Drents Museum. Jorden plays under the name Jorden, whereas Maghsoodloo uses the more imaginative grizzlybear79. Van Wely gave live comments, which were instructive and – more often!? – hilarious.

    In the first game, Jorden continued to show his good endgame skills (as we have seen in his match with Fedoseev). As White in a quiet Italian he doubled his opponent’s e-pawns and took charge in a four knights endgame. But it became tricky, and the Iranian GM cleverly saved the draw.

    Van Wely immediately received the message from Iran that Maghsoodloo ‘agreed that he had had a lucky escape’.

    In the second game, with black, Jorden played a specialty, the Ruy Lopez with 3…g6. Van Wely was a bit skeptic about the Dutchman’s provocative play. Soon the position was brimming with tactical tricks. Jorden lost a pawn, but had interesting compensation for it. While it looked as if White didn’t have a good plan, Van Foreest started wavering in approaching time-trouble, lost a second pawn, and had to resign in the end.

    It was a wonderful visit for the players to this beautiful museum in the capital of the province of Drenthe!

    Replay the games: Game 1Game 2

    Find all photos here,

  • Report Round 5 Open & Round 3 Matches

    Report Round 5 Open & Round 3 Matches

    We have started the 5th round of the Open and the 3rd round of the matches.

    Both match games started with the same first two moves as in the first games, but in both White deviated on move 3. Sam Shankland played 3.Nf3 followed by the king’s bishop’s fianchetto against Peter Svidler’s 2…g6, and Vladimir Fedoseev met Jorden van Foreest’s 2…e6 with 3.Nf3 instead of 3.Nc3. So, we can expect two whole different ball games today!

     
     

    Hans Böhm: ‘Clever choice by Fedoseev’

    Fedoseev’s choice for the quiet line of today, with an early exchange of queens, was called clever by the man in charge of the commentary today, Hans Böhm, who sends happy chess greetings to chess fans all over the world!

    The position after 14…Re8 was still known from a quick draw by Karjakin and Anand from the Tata Steel tournament of this year. Karjakin played 15.Bc3 immediately, Fedoseev first limited Black’s c8-bishop with 15.f3. The (non-)development of this bishop is Black’s main problem in this line.

    Vladimir Fedoseev

    Dynamic play by Svidler

    Peter Svidler has responded dynamically to Sam Shankland’s double fianchetto. He has opened the centre and offered a pawn with the active 10…Nc6, which White’d better not take… not immediately, of course, but after 11.Nd2 Bg4 White did take the pawn, and commentator Hans Böhm doubted if Black now has sufficient compensation.

    A Van Randtwijk shocker

    Irishman Henry Li was in for an early shock today.

    Black has mistakenly taken on f3, which turns out to be a grave error. Here he must have counted on the move 11…Nd4 but was in for a shock: Van Randtwijk replied with the lethal 12.Qxf6! and White wins a piece in view of 12…Bxf6 13.Bxf6, threatening 14.Ne7+.

    Mick van Randtwijk

    Was Fedoseev’s 15.f3 wrong?

    Yes, the move may have the idea to limit Black’s c8-bishop. But now with Black’s knight still on a5, Van Foreest played 15…f5! 16.Bd5+ Be6 and Black keeps his pawn. White gets a rook on the seventh rank for it, but is this really better than the plan with 15.Bc3 Nc6 16.Rab1, with nice control for White?

    Rash queenside castling by Ravi

    Rakshitta Ravi has ambitiously castled queenside on move 15, which was an invitation for Valentin Buckels to play 15…d4 and demolish White’s queenside. This looks disastrous for the 13-year-old Indian girl, but she has saved herself from bad positions before. Will she make it this time?

    Interesting struggle on top boards

    The fight on the top board of the Open, Amin-Guseinov, is quite interesting. White has the structure, Black the activity. It looks like a dynamic balance. Dmitry Kryakvin is mounting the pressure on Stefan Kuipers, who is having a hard time.

    Dmitry Kryakvin

    His teammate Merijn van Delft seems to be holding up better against Evgeny Romanov. His kingside looks slightly loose, but the same goes for White’s queenside. Their teammate Roeland Pruijssers is equalish against Erik van den Doel, but is now starting something on the kingside.

    Roel Hamblok wins

    The first full point of the day was scored by Roel Hamblok. The Belgian FM got very fluent play on the black side of a McCucheon French and never looked back, finishing off with a relentless king hunt against Jip Damen.

    Svidler easily equalizes

    In fact Peter Svidler did have sufficient compensation for the sacrificed pawn, as he proved with a simple liquidation on moves 17 and 18 (…Bh6 and …Ne4). White’s a- and c-pawns were doomed, and now a position is reached where neither side seems to be able to undertake much. We’ll see if these top GMs can surprise us after all.

    There are different ways to concentrate before a game…

    Shankland and Svidler draw

    The first undecided game in this match – more soon!

    Analysis of Shankland-Svidler

    Here is what the players told us right after the game:

    Shankland-Svidler

    1.d4 Nf6 2.c4 g6 3.Nf3 Bg7 4.g3 c6 5.Bg2 d5 6.b3 dxc4 7.bxc4 c5 8.Bb2 cxd4 9.Nxd4 O-O 10.O-O

    10…Nc6

    ‘This move was played by Anish (Giri, against Kramnik in Stavanger 2016, PB), so it should be good’, said Svidler.

    11.Nxc6 bxc6 12.Nd2 Bg4 13.Bxc6 Rc8 14.Bf3 Bxf3 15.exf3 Qd3 16.Rc1 Rfd8 17.Bc3

    17.Nb3 looked scary’, Svidler thought. ‘But it doesn’t work’, Shankland replied immediately: ’17…Qxd1 18.Rfxd1 Rxd1+ 19.Rxd1 Rxc4 20.Rd8+ Bf8 21.Bd4 and now 21…Ra4 saves Black: 22.Bxf6 exf6 23.Nc5 Rxa2 24.Nd7 Kg7 25.Nxf8

    and now White’s knight doesn’t get out. Perhaps White can get a pawn for it but this should be an easy draw.’

    17…Bh6 18.f4 Ne4

    This direct method had been underestimated by the American GM.

    19.Nxe4 Qxe4 20.Qa4 Rxc4 21.Qxa7 Ra8 22.Qd7 Rxa2 23.Rfe1

    ‘A devilish trick’, Shankland grinned.

    23…Qf3

    Not 23…Rxc3? 24.Qc8+ and White wins! But now the fire goes out.

    24.Bd4 Rxc1 25.Rxc1 Bf8 26.Rc8 Ra8 27.Rxa8 Qxa8 28.Be3 ½-½

    ‘A pretty OK game’, Svidler said. ‘Of course it’s better if you know

    everything and you don’t have to work it all out over the board.’ ‘Anyway the level of the three games has been pretty good so far’, Shankland ventured. ‘Yes’, Svidler agreed. ‘In the first game, Sam played much better, in the second I played slightly better…’ ‘Much better’, Shankland interrupted. ‘Of course if both sides play good all games should end in a draw, but still it was OK.’ And off they went to grab a bite to eat together.

     

     
    Kryakvin cracks Kuipers
     

    Stefan Kuipers has resigned in a prospectless position. After Dmitry Kryakvin’s last move, 36.Rf6, all kinds of bishop sacrifices are in the air, and the Dutch IM decided not to wait which one the Russian was going to choose.

    On first board structure seems to be winning from activity. Bassem Amin has gained a pawn with some intricate manoeuvres, and it doesn’t seem as if Gadir Guseinov can create anything here.

    Bassem Amin is not quite used to autumn temperatures in Hoogeveen, but his play doesn’t suffer from it

    Safarli in pursuit

    Eltaj Safarli, no. 2 by Elo rating in the Open, beat Marijn den Hartog. The Azeri GM was always slightly better, and the attempt at liberation by the young Dutch player with 17…d5 and 18…Ne4 backfired badly.

    Eltaj Safarli in round 2

    Draw Pruijssers-Van den Doel

    The encounter between the two highest-placed Dutch players, GM Roeland Pruijssers and GM Erik van den Doel, has just ended in a draw after a fairly uneventful game.

    Van Delft also cracks

    The third Apeldoorn player on the top boards, Merijn van Delft, is also cracking in time pressure.

    Romanov-Van Delft

    In this position the Dutch IM tried to lift the pressure with 34…Ned5? but this led to material loss. After 35.c6 Qe8 (unfortunately 35…Qd6 also loses a piece after 36.Bxd4 Nxb4 (this counter-capture doesn’t save Black here) 37.Be5) 36.Nxd5 Rxd5 37.Bxc7 cannot take back because the rook on d5 is hanging due to the pin along the e-file. Merijn had to play 37…Qxc6 but this is losing.

    Merijn van Delft (right) with Dmitry Kryakvin before their round 3 game

    Third fighting draw Fedoseev-Van Foreest

    For the third time, Vladimir Fedoseev tested the endgame technique of Jorden van Foreest for hours, and again the Groningen GM didn’t budge. A third fighting draw against a world top player.

    The discussion was about White’s 15th move.

    Fedoseev-Van Foreest

    Here Karjakin had played 15.Bc3 against Anand in Wijk aan Zee, after which White has some pressure after 15…Nc6 16.Rab1. Van Foreest knew this, but Fedoseev didn’t, although he was the one who had opted for this variation. ‘But anyway, after the line in the game White still had pressure.’ ‘Yes, it was quite unpleasant for Black’, Van Foreest admitted.

    According to the players White missed a chance on move 23.

    ‘Here, instead of 23.Rb5 I should have played 23.Kf2, when I should have some edge’, Fedoseev thought. Stockfish gives 23…Rc8 24.Bc1 c3 25.Rxa7 c2 26.Rb7 Nd5 27.Ke1 Nc3 as an equalizer here. Anyway, the balance was never disturbed in the rest of the game.

    Jorden van Foreest (right) still has a lot to smile about

     

    Some curious minor promotions

    Rob Bertholee came to tell us that there was a highly curious incident in his game of today, with some reverse minor promotions:

    Khoi Pham-Bertholee

    38.Kf1

    ‘It turns out that he should have played 38.Kf2 here’, Bertholee said. ‘Then after the same moves as in the game…

    38…Re8 39.c7 d2

    … here I had calculated that if White plays 40.c8Q I am winning with 40…d1N+. But with the king on f2, here he would have had the same move as in the game:

    40.c8N+!

    Now I could escape with 40…Kc7 41.Rc5+ Kb8 but with the king on f2 he would have saved himself with 42.Rd5 and I don’t have 42…Re1 with check!’

     

    Two more interesting draws were seen in the matches today, and with the rest day coming both matches are still very balanced.

    In the Open, Bassem Amin took over by beating the leader, Gadir Guseinov, with very careful and technically strong play. Dmitry Kryakvin pushed Stefan Kuipers to the edge and joined the lead on 4½ points. Evgeny Romanov, Eltaj Safarli, P Karthikeyan and Guseinov are trailing by half a point.

  • Verslag Ronde 5 Open & Ronde 3 Matches

    Verslag Ronde 5 Open & Ronde 3 Matches

    We have started the 5th round of the Open and the 3rd round of the matches.

    Both match games started with the same first two moves as in the first games, but in both White deviated on move 3. Sam Shankland played 3.Nf3 followed by the king’s bishop’s fianchetto against Peter Svidler’s 2…g6, and Vladimir Fedoseev met Jorden van Foreest’s 2…e6 with 3.Nf3 instead of 3.Nc3. So, we can expect two whole different ball games today!

     
     

    Hans Böhm: ‘Clever choice by Fedoseev’

    Fedoseev’s choice for the quiet line of today, with an early exchange of queens, was called clever by the man in charge of the commentary today, Hans Böhm, who sends happy chess greetings to chess fans all over the world!

    The position after 14…Re8 was still known from a quick draw by Karjakin and Anand from the Tata Steel tournament of this year. Karjakin played 15.Bc3 immediately, Fedoseev first limited Black’s c8-bishop with 15.f3. The (non-)development of this bishop is Black’s main problem in this line.

    Vladimir Fedoseev

    Dynamic play by Svidler

    Peter Svidler has responded dynamically to Sam Shankland’s double fianchetto. He has opened the centre and offered a pawn with the active 10…Nc6, which White’d better not take… not immediately, of course, but after 11.Nd2 Bg4 White did take the pawn, and commentator Hans Böhm doubted if Black now has sufficient compensation.

    A Van Randtwijk shocker

    Irishman Henry Li was in for an early shock today.

    Black has mistakenly taken on f3, which turns out to be a grave error. Here he must have counted on the move 11…Nd4 but was in for a shock: Van Randtwijk replied with the lethal 12.Qxf6! and White wins a piece in view of 12…Bxf6 13.Bxf6, threatening 14.Ne7+.

    Mick van Randtwijk

    Was Fedoseev’s 15.f3 wrong?

    Yes, the move may have the idea to limit Black’s c8-bishop. But now with Black’s knight still on a5, Van Foreest played 15…f5! 16.Bd5+ Be6 and Black keeps his pawn. White gets a rook on the seventh rank for it, but is this really better than the plan with 15.Bc3 Nc6 16.Rab1, with nice control for White?

    Rash queenside castling by Ravi

    Rakshitta Ravi has ambitiously castled queenside on move 15, which was an invitation for Valentin Buckels to play 15…d4 and demolish White’s queenside. This looks disastrous for the 13-year-old Indian girl, but she has saved herself from bad positions before. Will she make it this time?

    Interesting struggle on top boards

    The fight on the top board of the Open, Amin-Guseinov, is quite interesting. White has the structure, Black the activity. It looks like a dynamic balance. Dmitry Kryakvin is mounting the pressure on Stefan Kuipers, who is having a hard time.

    Dmitry Kryakvin

    His teammate Merijn van Delft seems to be holding up better against Evgeny Romanov. His kingside looks slightly loose, but the same goes for White’s queenside. Their teammate Roeland Pruijssers is equalish against Erik van den Doel, but is now starting something on the kingside.

    Roel Hamblok wins

    The first full point of the day was scored by Roel Hamblok. The Belgian FM got very fluent play on the black side of a McCucheon French and never looked back, finishing off with a relentless king hunt against Jip Damen.

    Svidler easily equalizes

    In fact Peter Svidler did have sufficient compensation for the sacrificed pawn, as he proved with a simple liquidation on moves 17 and 18 (…Bh6 and …Ne4). White’s a- and c-pawns were doomed, and now a position is reached where neither side seems to be able to undertake much. We’ll see if these top GMs can surprise us after all.

    There are different ways to concentrate before a game…

    Shankland and Svidler draw

    The first undecided game in this match – more soon!

    Analysis of Shankland-Svidler

    Here is what the players told us right after the game:

    Shankland-Svidler

    1.d4 Nf6 2.c4 g6 3.Nf3 Bg7 4.g3 c6 5.Bg2 d5 6.b3 dxc4 7.bxc4 c5 8.Bb2 cxd4 9.Nxd4 O-O 10.O-O

    10…Nc6

    ‘This move was played by Anish (Giri, against Kramnik in Stavanger 2016, PB), so it should be good’, said Svidler.

    11.Nxc6 bxc6 12.Nd2 Bg4 13.Bxc6 Rc8 14.Bf3 Bxf3 15.exf3 Qd3 16.Rc1 Rfd8 17.Bc3

    17.Nb3 looked scary’, Svidler thought. ‘But it doesn’t work’, Shankland replied immediately: ’17…Qxd1 18.Rfxd1 Rxd1+ 19.Rxd1 Rxc4 20.Rd8+ Bf8 21.Bd4 and now 21…Ra4 saves Black: 22.Bxf6 exf6 23.Nc5 Rxa2 24.Nd7 Kg7 25.Nxf8

    and now White’s knight doesn’t get out. Perhaps White can get a pawn for it but this should be an easy draw.’

    17…Bh6 18.f4 Ne4

    This direct method had been underestimated by the American GM.

    19.Nxe4 Qxe4 20.Qa4 Rxc4 21.Qxa7 Ra8 22.Qd7 Rxa2 23.Rfe1

    ‘A devilish trick’, Shankland grinned.

    23…Qf3

    Not 23…Rxc3? 24.Qc8+ and White wins! But now the fire goes out.

    24.Bd4 Rxc1 25.Rxc1 Bf8 26.Rc8 Ra8 27.Rxa8 Qxa8 28.Be3 ½-½

    ‘A pretty OK game’, Svidler said. ‘Of course it’s better if you know

    everything and you don’t have to work it all out over the board.’ ‘Anyway the level of the three games has been pretty good so far’, Shankland ventured. ‘Yes’, Svidler agreed. ‘In the first game, Sam played much better, in the second I played slightly better…’ ‘Much better’, Shankland interrupted. ‘Of course if both sides play good all games should end in a draw, but still it was OK.’ And off they went to grab a bite to eat together.

     

     
    Kryakvin cracks Kuipers
     

    Stefan Kuipers has resigned in a prospectless position. After Dmitry Kryakvin’s last move, 36.Rf6, all kinds of bishop sacrifices are in the air, and the Dutch IM decided not to wait which one the Russian was going to choose.

    On first board structure seems to be winning from activity. Bassem Amin has gained a pawn with some intricate manoeuvres, and it doesn’t seem as if Gadir Guseinov can create anything here.

    Bassem Amin is not quite used to autumn temperatures in Hoogeveen, but his play doesn’t suffer from it

    Safarli in pursuit

    Eltaj Safarli, no. 2 by Elo rating in the Open, beat Marijn den Hartog. The Azeri GM was always slightly better, and the attempt at liberation by the young Dutch player with 17…d5 and 18…Ne4 backfired badly.

    Eltaj Safarli in round 2

    Draw Pruijssers-Van den Doel

    The encounter between the two highest-placed Dutch players, GM Roeland Pruijssers and GM Erik van den Doel, has just ended in a draw after a fairly uneventful game.

    Van Delft also cracks

    The third Apeldoorn player on the top boards, Merijn van Delft, is also cracking in time pressure.

    Romanov-Van Delft

    In this position the Dutch IM tried to lift the pressure with 34…Ned5? but this led to material loss. After 35.c6 Qe8 (unfortunately 35…Qd6 also loses a piece after 36.Bxd4 Nxb4 (this counter-capture doesn’t save Black here) 37.Be5) 36.Nxd5 Rxd5 37.Bxc7 cannot take back because the rook on d5 is hanging due to the pin along the e-file. Merijn had to play 37…Qxc6 but this is losing.

    Merijn van Delft (right) with Dmitry Kryakvin before their round 3 game

    Third fighting draw Fedoseev-Van Foreest

    For the third time, Vladimir Fedoseev tested the endgame technique of Jorden van Foreest for hours, and again the Groningen GM didn’t budge. A third fighting draw against a world top player.

    The discussion was about White’s 15th move.

    Fedoseev-Van Foreest

    Here Karjakin had played 15.Bc3 against Anand in Wijk aan Zee, after which White has some pressure after 15…Nc6 16.Rab1. Van Foreest knew this, but Fedoseev didn’t, although he was the one who had opted for this variation. ‘But anyway, after the line in the game White still had pressure.’ ‘Yes, it was quite unpleasant for Black’, Van Foreest admitted.

    According to the players White missed a chance on move 23.

    ‘Here, instead of 23.Rb5 I should have played 23.Kf2, when I should have some edge’, Fedoseev thought. Stockfish gives 23…Rc8 24.Bc1 c3 25.Rxa7 c2 26.Rb7 Nd5 27.Ke1 Nc3 as an equalizer here. Anyway, the balance was never disturbed in the rest of the game.

    Jorden van Foreest (right) still has a lot to smile about

     

    Some curious minor promotions

    Rob Bertholee came to tell us that there was a highly curious incident in his game of today, with some reverse minor promotions:

    Khoi Pham-Bertholee

    38.Kf1

    ‘It turns out that he should have played 38.Kf2 here’, Bertholee said. ‘Then after the same moves as in the game…

    38…Re8 39.c7 d2

    … here I had calculated that if White plays 40.c8Q I am winning with 40…d1N+. But with the king on f2, here he would have had the same move as in the game:

    40.c8N+!

    Now I could escape with 40…Kc7 41.Rc5+ Kb8 but with the king on f2 he would have saved himself with 42.Rd5 and I don’t have 42…Re1 with check!’

     

    Two more interesting draws were seen in the matches today, and with the rest day coming both matches are still very balanced.

    In the Open, Bassem Amin took over by beating the leader, Gadir Guseinov, with very careful and technically strong play. Dmitry Kryakvin pushed Stefan Kuipers to the edge and joined the lead on 4½ points. Evgeny Romanov, Eltaj Safarli, P Karthikeyan and Guseinov are trailing by half a point.

  • Report Round 4 Open and Round 2 Matches

    Report Round 4 Open and Round 2 Matches

    Vind alle foto’s hier.

    The Matches have started!

    With the famous Dutch arbiter Geurt Gijssen as a special visitor, the two match games have just started. Peter Svidler and Sam Shankland opted for a Symmetrical English Opening…

    whereas Jorden van Foreest and Vladimir Fedoseev played a Najdorf with 6.Be2 and 7.f4.

    The commentary starts in roughly half an hour with Jeroen Bosch, Dutch IM and author of ‘SOS’ fame.

    Interesting theoretical discussions

    Shankland still seems to be in his preparation, even though Svidler played the surprising 11.Bb5!?, inviting 11…a6, an old idea of famous Russian coach Yuri Razuvaev which has never been repeated since 1994. Shankland’s 14…f6!?, covering some important dark squares but also creating some weaknesses, was still quickly played but is quite a remarkable idea.

    The Sicilian on the other board promises to become sharp. Jorden van Foreest thought long about the crucial move 10.g4, and Vladimir Fedoseev’s reply 10…d5 is surprising. Many players would blindly go 10…b5 here.

    Round 4 of the Open has started!

    A smooth start of the second round of this day. The only player who hasn’t arrived yet is the black player on first board, Evgeny Romanov, who is (supposed to be) playing Gadir Guseinov.

    Update: Romanov arrived a few minutes late and now finds himself behind an O’Kelly Sicilian by transposition.

    One short draw

    Erik van den Doel and Eltaj Safarli took a free afternoon with a 5-move draw. On the rest of the boards it seems that the players just want to play. IM Iniyan seems to be in danger again, as it looks like White (Enrico Vroombout) comes first on the queenside in this chain struggle in the King’s Indian.

    A nasty trick

    Young Loek van der Hagen (Loek II??) is experiencing the latent dangers that are lurking in the modest-looking Queen’s Pawn set-up played by Frenchman Hector Giacomini. Loek’s 10…f5? was premature, as he has just found out.

    Giacomini-Van der Hagen

    Here he had to pull the emergency brake with 13…Qg6, as the game move 13…Nb6? fails to the nice 14.Bf7! Rxf7 15.Qh5 and this is basically over!

    Hector Giacomini

    Shankland in trouble

    Sam Shankland seems to be on the verge of losing after he played 20…Ke7 in a fairly open position. After 20…Kf7 the problem would be Bxg6+ in many cases, but that might have been preferable above the game continuation. After 21…Bd6 and the exchange of bishops, the area around the black king looks pretty airy. Are we witnessing the resurrection of Peter Svidler here? He played 23.Rfd1 quickly and confidently.

    Van Foreest (half a) pawn up

    Jorden van Foreest has carefully surrounded the perky d5-pawn and conquered it. He is now a pawn up, but it’s doubled on the f-file and Fedoseev has some compensation.

    Comments by Svidler and Shankland

    Peter Svidler equalled the score in his match with Shankland with a quite convincing and attractive win today. The following moment was crucial:

    Svidler-Shankland

    Svidler said that after his bad stretch it was pleasant to be pressing again. ‘This is a very topical line which I don’t know much about. He obviously knew much more. Black should be OK in general.’ Shankland had indeed prepared very carefully, but mostly the positions without 11.Bb5 and 11…a6. ‘With the pawn on a6 there are some subtle differences’ — mostly, that the b7-pawn becomes weaker.

    15.c4!

    This is a dynamic move that Shankland hadn’t considered in his preparations: ‘I still think Black should be OK here, but I have to find some accurate moves.’

    15…b6

    Svidler: ‘I thought 15…Nxc4 16.Qxb7 Bb5 should be OK for Black.’ After 17.Bf4 (17.Re1, which Svidler had planned, may be easier for Black, he will be playing 17…Qd7 anyway) 17…Qd7 and White is still a bit better.

    16.c5 bxc5 17.dxc5 Bxc5 18.Bxa6 Rb8

    18…Rc6 might have been more precise, according to Svidler. After 19.Bb5 Rd6 20.Bh6 Kf7 Black may be able to solve his problems.

    19.Qc2 Qb6 20.Bd3

    ‘This was very awkward for Black’, said Svidler.

    20…Ke7

    Now White always has the threat of Qc2-d2-Qh6, but after 20…Kf7 there is always Bxg6+ hanging in the air.

    21.Bf4 Bd6

    21… Rbc8 looked more tenacious, when after 22.Qe2 (or first 22.Rab1) the black king should go to f7 anyway.

    After 22.Bxd6+ Qxd6 23.Rfd1 Black couldn’t find any way to make his pieces cooperate, and Svidler finished off with a number of careful moves, in the meantime walking a couple of miles through the playing hall. When it was over, he uttered a few sighs of relief.

     

    Again a draw for Jorden??

    Jorden van Foreest was clearly better for a while, while Fedoseev was searching for counterchances with his queen and knight. He had played quite carefully all afternoon, but then 42.b5? slipped out of his hand, and after this too optimistic push the b-pawn only became a weakness. Protecting it with 44.c4 weakened his king again. It looks like also this second hard-fought game will end in a draw.

    Wins for Amin and Pruijssers

    Bassem Amin’s game was again quite prematurely finished, just like this morning against Robby Kevlishvili. But this time the result was positive for him. Indian IM Shyaamnikhil was clearly worse, but he resigned the game at a pretty early stage. Roeland Pruijssers had some luck in his game against his teammate Nico Zwirs from Apeldoorn. Zwirs seemed OK, even better for a while,

    Pruijssers-Zwirs

    Black should be fine after 28…gxf5 29.Bxf5 Rc7 30.g6 Kf8 followed by taking on b3, but he played 28…Nxb3? immediately, after which he was nailed to the wall with the zwischenzug 29.f6!, imprisoning the black bishop. This eventually turned out fatal for him.

    Nico Zwirs